Family-inclusive approaches in the context of a dual diagnosis

A systematic review of relational and individual wellbeing outcomes

Authors: Kuntsche, S., Vuong, A., Cloud, Z., Cosgrove, M., Pradel, M., Hameed, M., McIntosh, J.E.

Published by: Clinical Psychology Review

Citation: Kuntsche, S., Vuong, A., Cloud, Z., Cosgrove, M., Pradel, M., Hameed, M., & McIntosh, J. E. (2026). Family-inclusive approaches in the context of a dual diagnosis: A systematic review of relational and individual wellbeing outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 128, 102762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102762


Full text alternative

This research is relevant to practitioners working across:

  • Alcohol and other drug (AOD) services,
  • Mental health services, and
  • Child, youth and family services.

It is also relevant to family members supporting someone with a dual diagnosis (co-occurring mental health and substance use conditions).

We conducted a systematic search of evidence to better understand family-inclusive approaches in the treatment of dual diagnosis. We looked at research from 2000-2026, specifically exploring:

  • Family-inclusive interventions available for the treatment of dual diagnosis,
  • How families are involved in care,
  • What effect family-inclusive approaches have on relational wellbeing, mental health, and substance use outcomes.

Our search found 28 studies involving family-inclusive treatment of clients with a dual diagnosis, generally focusing on adolescent and adult client populations.

Family-inclusive models were varied across studies, with examples including structured family therapies, behavioural family approaches, integrated family interventions, psychoeducation combined with skills-building, and multidimensional family approaches.

Across both groups (adolescents and adults), family-inclusive approaches generally performed as well as or better than treatment-as-usual, with reported benefits including improved:

  • mental health and substance use outcomes,
  • global and family functioning,
  • family communication,
  • family conflict,
  • parenting and caregiver skills (particularly in adolescent studies).

  • The review highlights the value of family-inclusive practice as a meaningful component of dual diagnosis treatment, and points to a need for greater prioritisation and further research into it.
  • It shows that family-inclusive practice can contribute both to improvements in individual symptoms and to stronger relational wellbeing within families.
  • Service models should consider strengthening integration across mental health and AOD sectors, building workforce capacity in family-inclusive practice and actively engaging families in assessment, treatment and recovery planning.


Stay connected with the Bouverie Centre