Smaller group teaching
Below are several strategies which might be useful for a smaller group teaching situation.
Strategies for making smaller group teaching effective
Before each session
- remind yourself of the aims and desired learning outcomes of the subject of which the sessions are part
- set clear objectives which relate to the aims of the subject for each session
- take into account the group’s background knowledge, experience etc
- plan and time the session carefully
- plan alternative materials and approaches in case something doesn’t work out
- vary activities
- prepare/copy handouts well ahead of time
- read class list and start to learn (pronunciation of) names
- arrive early to check room, seating, equipment, technology etc
Beginning the first session
- explain the objectives for the subject/session(s), be prepared to adjust session aims in the light of the
- students’ comments and reactions
- discuss (or use an icebreaking activity explaining/illustrating)
- the learning approach you intend to use
- your expectations of the students
- the students’ expectations of you, the subject etc
During each session
- remember (and possibly refer to) the aims
- engage group in theme, activity, topic right from the start
- vary the roles individuals will play within the group
- vary the direction of your questions (individuals, groups, pairs)
- set clear tasks
- use eye contact
- ask both closed and open ended questions
- be prepared for silence
- address students by their names as often as possible
- use humour appropriately
- keep a sharp eye on the time
At end of each session
- 5 minutes before the end of session
- close session with a summary (given by you or person responsible)
- thank the students
- remind students of the aim of the next session
After each session
evaluate: note your impression of if/how you achieved the objectives; what worked what didn’t.
List of smaller group activities
Assessment preparation
Students are asked to work in small groups to assess a model essay/project and use or develop a set of marking criteria. Or students may be asked to look at an assessment question and plan a possible solution or response. This can be the basis for later discussion.
Advantages: A list of criteria for assessment can thus be worked through or designed by the group
Disadvantages: Uneven participation in the task can become a problem.
Brainstorm
Students present a query or difficulty to a small group. The group then brainstorms the issue including possible factors and solutions. Reports to the larger group follow.
Advantages: Excellent way to get over hurdles in research questions.
Disadvantages: Each person has to be committed to the task.
Buzz groups
Short discussion in small groups ie neighbours in lecture theatre, about a set topic eg difficulties they are having, a question set by the lecturer.
Advantages: Increases participation and engagement; students are less inhibited; good for checking misunderstandings.
Disadvantages: Has to be timed correctly and well controlled in larger groups.
Debate
Students are given two opposing positions to defend which focus on a key question in their study.
Advantages: Can be used in a wide range of settings and teaching modes (including online). Excellent way to liven up a dead tut.
Disadvantages: The more articulate students tend to win the debate even if they don’t believe in their position. The lecturer has to be ready with clear criteria to judge the outcome of the debate.
Document analysis
A key document (perhaps previously unseen) is studied by small groups under a specific angle. Reports are given and analysed.
Advantages: Excellent way to introduce a new concept as a warm-up before a deeper analysis and study.
Disadvantages: Different ability levels have to be checked, timing is important.
Controlled Discussion
Tutor controlled discussion; questions being asked/answered by tutor or students.
Advantages: Good for checking for knowledge and understanding, giving quick feedback.
Disadvantages: Inhibits open discussion, reticent students are not heard.
Cross-over groups
Labelling each student by two codes (ie A, B C and 1, 2, 3) codes A1, A2, A3 and B1, B2 B3. By asking all As, Bs and Cs to work together, then all 1s and 2s and 3s the groups can be mixed in such a way that each student meets at least one member from all other groups.
Advantages: Excellent for mixing people and information; simple to organise avoids the plenary session where the information is shared.
Disadvantages: Can lead to confusion about the learning outcomes; can be irritating if it breaks up an absorbing discussion.
Horseshoe groups
Room arrangement where students work at large tables each of which has a seat kept free for a roving tutor who can join any table when required or can alternatively teach from the front of the room.
Advantages: Good for larger groups; enables students to work together; keeps tutor flexible.
Disadvantages: Students can ‘hide’ in the group, which makes it hard to identify students with difficulties
Peer teaching
Working in small groups, students research a topic and prepare to teach it to their fellow students.
Advantages: Teaching a topic to fellow students is an excellent way to become very familiar with all aspects of it.
Disadvantages: The lecturer has to stay involved and supervise the quality of the presentation and be ready to assist if misunderstanding occur. Some fellow students feel they don’t get high quality teaching if a peer does the teaching.
Role play
Students are asked to adopt a role and play it within a given scenario. Students are then required to debrief the experience, analysing the scenario and the various actions/behaviours using key concepts or principles from the course.
Advantages: Excellent way to get students to engage with a subject of topic in a realistic manner. This can be used in a variety of teaching situation and modes, including online.
Disadvantages: Shy students find this very taxing. This can be overcome if the role is given to a group who works on the details for the role and only one student actually acts it.
Seminars
A classic seminar has a presentation by an individual (or a small group) followed by an open discussion by the larger group who have all prepared for this session as well. The tutor chairs the session.
Advantages: Very stimulating when well run and prepared.
Disadvantages: Tasks often unclear; leadership roles become confused; can end up as a mini-lecture.
Snowball groups (pyramiding)
Pose a question, ask individuals to work on it, then to share their thoughts with one other, increase the complexity of the task and size of groups until you have a plenary session.
Advantages: Good for encouraging the creation of well-integrated ideas; allows students to think for themselves before the open discussion; ensures good participation in plenary discussion.
Disadvantages: Takes time to unfold and breaks up feeling of cohesion in some groups.
Step-by-step discussion
Led discussion sequence based on parts of a set text, video or similar.
Advantages: Economical use of larger groups; students more independent from tutor; combines information giving, processing and feedback.
Disadvantages: Sequence may not correspond with students’ needs.
Travelling journal
Journals, letters or reflections/conversations are written and passed between group members. On a given topic, each member of the group is required to write a comment (reflection etc) and pass it to other members of the group, other members then respond and adds their own commentary, thus building a dialogue.
Advantages: Free expression and exchange of views between students; written form is preferred by some.
Disadvantages: Response needs to be provided by lecturer, this can become time consuming if not included in assessment. How to assess individual contributions needs to be made clear.
Further reading
- Bertola, P. & Murphy, E. (1994) Tutoring at University, A Beginner’s Practical Guide. Paradigm Books.
- Boud, D. (1998) The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14 (1). 20-30.
- Habeshaw, S., Habeshaw, T. & Gibbs, G. (1984) 53 Interesting things to do in your seminars and tutorials. Technical and Educational Services Ltd, Bristol.
- Heywood, J. (2000) Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
- Huba, M. & Freed, J. (2000) Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- James, R., McInnes, C. & Devlin, M. (2002) Assessing Learning in Australian Universities. Melbourne: CSHE and Canberra: AUTC.
- Jaques, D, (1984, 1992) Learning in Groups. Gulf Publishing Co.
- Lublin, J. (1987). Conducting Tutorials. HERDSA Green Guide no 6.
- Marton, F. et al (1997) The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. (Chaps 5, 6, 7 and 8).
- Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge. (Esp chap 9).