Applying for promotion
Tom Angelo introduces the promotion process and discusses the considerations required when using your teaching and curriculum design as evidence for promotion.
Filmed at a CTLC workshop on 22 July 2010.
An introduction to the promotion process
How the committee operates and the processes involved.
The four Es: expectations, evidence, explanation, examples
How to present and exemplify your case to the committee.
- Other formats
- The four Es: expectations, evidence, explanation, examples MP4 [7.72 MB]
- The four Es: expectations, evidence, explanation, examples MP3 [2.47 MB]
- The four Es: expectations, evidence, explanation, examples Transcript
- The four Es: expectations, evidence, explanation, examples Permalink
- Other formats on request: webmarketing@latrobe.edu.au
Evidence
An analogy explaining the importance of meeting the Minimum Standards for Academic Levels (MSALs)
Types of evidence
The three levels of evidence - peer review, professional academic preparation and references.
Evidence of teaching
Some forms of evidence are more powerful than others.
Curriculum development
Having your curriculum evaluated to use as evidence for promotion.
Faculty and school support
Discussing the role of your Head of School and Faculty Head.
Relative to opportunity
The promotions committee considers individual circumstances such as workload and personal needs.
