NURSING PRACTICE INNOVATION PROJECT

NSG5NPI

2018

Credit points: 30

Subject outline

In this subject, you will be offered the opportunity to design and implement and evaluate a project that supports the development of your leadership or educational study focus, scholarly inquiry and skills in reporting. This innovation project may include the implementation and evaluation of a projectrelated to an education program, leadership program or quality improvement activity within your current area of practice.

SchoolSchool of Nursing & Midwifery

Credit points30

Subject Co-ordinatorFergus Campbell

Available to Study Abroad StudentsYes

Subject year levelYear Level 5 - Masters

Exchange StudentsYes

Subject particulars

Subject rules

Prerequisites Must be enrolled in course code: HMNSCO and must have passed NSG5IPC.

Co-requisitesN/A

Incompatible subjectsN/A

Equivalent subjectsN/A

Special conditionsN/A

Graduate capabilities & intended learning outcomes

01. Utilise analytical, problem solving, planning, negotiation & evaluation skills to inform the design and implementation of a project of scholarly investigation

Activities:
On line activity, literature searching using a range of sources of evidence to identify area for innovative project. Online Activity, set goals for project that are SMART Undertake the agreed innovative project

02. Implement and conduct an innovative project in a safe and ethical manner using the required specific skills, knowledge and attitudes required to achieve the negotiated outcome.

Activities:
Develop ethical guidelines to support the implementation of the project. Share this with fellow students and provide constructive feedback

03. Utilise different forms of evidence to validate conclusions drawn from your investigation

Activities:
Evaluate project using a model of reflection and compare project findings/outcomes against current best practice.

04. Report on the outcomes of the project in a format appropriate for different purposes

Activities:
Select a quality journal related to your topic area and prepare a report about the project according to the journal's authour guidelines.

Subject options

Select to view your study options…

Start date between: and    Key dates

Online, 2018, Teaching Session 10, Online

Overview

Online enrolmentYes

Maximum enrolment sizeN/A

Enrolment information

Subject Instance Co-ordinatorFergus Campbell

Class requirements

Evidence Based Learning Week: 16 - 28
One 300.0 hours evidence based learning per study period on any day including weekend during the day from week 16 to week 28 and delivered via online.
"300 hours of directed and self-directed online learning"

Assessments

Assessment elementComments% ILO*
2000 word equivalent writing taskFor example, this assessment task may be a combination of project planning which includes ethical considerations and peer review/feedback.20 01, 02
3000 word equivalent writing task or multimedia equivalentFor example, this formative assessment task may be presented as a reflective piece of assessment that asks students to explore their experiences of implementing their project.30 01, 02, 03, 04
5000 word equivalent writing task or multimedia equivalentThis assessment task may take the form of an article written in prepration for publication in a quality peer reviewed journal, or the development of procedural/policy guidelines for an organisation or similar reflective of the project planned and implemented within the subject.50 01, 02, 03, 04

Online, 2018, Teaching Session 13, Online

Overview

Online enrolmentYes

Maximum enrolment sizeN/A

Enrolment information

Subject Instance Co-ordinatorFergus Campbell

Class requirements

Evidence Based Learning Week: 37 - 49
One 300.0 hours evidence based learning per study period on any day including weekend during the day from week 37 to week 49 and delivered via online.
"300 hours of directed and self-directed online learning"

Assessments

Assessment elementComments% ILO*
2000 word equivalent writing taskFor example, this assessment task may be a combination of project planning which includes ethical considerations and peer review/feedback.20 01, 02
3000 word equivalent writing task or multimedia equivalentFor example, this formative assessment task may be presented as a reflective piece of assessment that asks students to explore their experiences of implementing their project.30 01, 02, 03, 04
5000 word equivalent writing task or multimedia equivalentThis assessment task may take the form of an article written in prepration for publication in a quality peer reviewed journal, or the development of procedural/policy guidelines for an organisation or similar reflective of the project planned and implemented within the subject.50 01, 02, 03, 04