Seven
theses about border genres / five modest proposals about
docudrama Five
modest proposals about docudrama I'm wondering if
I've given up on the term 'dramadoc', much less my clumsy
1998 neologism 'dramadoc/docudrama' (in my book No Other
Way To Tell It). There is a level at which this form is
still a 'duty-genre' (Brian Winston) whatever a national TV
system's orientation towards the concept of 'public
service'. Steve Lipkin* and I, researching docudrama in the
UK and the USA, have reached the conclusion that convergence
between UK 'dramadoc' and US 'docudrama' is not all
about the dumbing down of serious subjects. The best
examples (as with C19 melodrama) take a cultural crux or
anxiety, structure it around the 'well-made play' as a
witnessed-evidential, claim it as reconstruction, hope to
have it received as a kind of experience. Amongst
maker-intentions - however dubious these may be to the
'Over-Cautious Critick' (Ben Jonson) - there's still an
element of the dutiful? Even in 'Disease of the Week'
made-for-TV docudrama? * Steve Lipkin's
excellent Real Emotional Logic: Film and Television
Docudrama as Persuasive Practice was published this year
by Southern Illinois University Press. It is indispensable
for an understanding of the modern docudrama. As Lipkin
rightly asserts, docudrama's perennial power inheres in the
rhetorical nature of its practices.
![]()
![]()