Global Utilities

Welcome to La Trobe University


What's New?
Learning Centre
Courses
Podiatry Staff
Podiatry Research
Podiatry Clinic
Contacts

Student Pages

Department Home




Department of Podiatry

 


 

Outline

Introduction

Mechanisms of shock absorption during locomotion/gait

active mechanisms

passive mechanisms

Artificial shock attenuation

insoles/orthotic materials

surfaces

shoes

Do more expensive athletic shoes reduce injuries?


Heel strike transient

Upon heel strike, a ground reaction force (GRF) is transmitted from the ground to the foot which travels up through the lower extremity

The sharp irregularity in the GRF at heel strike (first 5-25 ms) is known as the heel strike transient


Measurement techniques

Force platforms and accelerometers form the foundation of skeletal transient investigation

Other techniques used to analyse impact situations and their mechanical effects include

Foot sensor systems

Inverse Dynamics

Simulation Models

The approaches and limitations of each of these techniques are discussed elsewhere (Nigg BM et al. J Applied Biomechanics 1995: 407-432)


Force platforms

Haven't consistently shown a heel strike transient

Heel strike transient may be observed for the vertical component of the force platform readings when platform settings are correct

This requires a force platform of sufficiently high natural frequencies, sampled at a high rate and without excessive low pass filtering

Units of measurement - Newtons (N)


Accelerometers

Measures acceleration changes at their point of application following heel contact.

magnitude and frequency of components of the heel strike transient at a particular body segment can be quantified.

Units of measurement - gravities (g), where 1 g = 10 ms-2


Accelerometers

Shock attenuation in the human body during locomotion

At heel strike during normal walking, peak forces at the tibia and skull have been recorded at 5 and 0.5 gravities (g) respectively.

Peak magnitudes of the transient stress wave generated at heel strike are reduced by a factor of 1.45 across the knee joint and by a factor of 3.29-3.74 from the tibia to the forehead.

This suggests that there is shock attenuation along the musculoskeletal system.


Definitions

Shock attenuation versus cushioning

Definitions vary

Shock attenuation - reduction in amplitude of heel strike transient or reduction in amplitude in impact forces

For the purposes of this lecture - Shock attenuation is reduction in amplitude of heel strike transient

Cushioning is reduction in amplitude in impact forces.


Mechanisms of shock attenuation in the human body

Active mechanisms

proprioception, joint position, muscle tone

Passive mechanisms

viscoelasticity of bone, cartilage, synovial fluid and soft tissue such as heel pad, capsule, menisci, IVDs

Active mechanisms of shock attenuation

Joint motion combined with eccentric contraction of muscles

F = ma (where a = change in velocity/time)

Implies that the rate at which the body segment changes velocity (negative acceleration) at initial contact will influence the magnitude of the GRFs and heel strike transient produced

Less force - smaller magnitude of acceleration


At initial contact, an alteration in joint position increases the time over which the velocity of a body segment will change, thereby reducing the magnitude of forces produced at impact.

Magnitude of acceleration is reduced

(When muscles lose their ability to absorb energy, more energy is transmitted to skeletal system. This is thought to contribute to the higher number of stress-related bone problems during the later part of a marathon when muscles are presumable fatigued)


Active shock attenuation during the gait cycle

Contact period motion of

Subtalar joint (pronation)

Ankle joint (dorsiflex/plantarflexion)

Knee joint (flexion) joint


Subtalar joint

Shock attenuation is a primary function of subtalar joint pronation following heel strike

Subtalar joint pronation disperses forces

directly

indirectly by facilitating knee joint flexion


Shock attenuation STJ

Reducing subtalar joint pronation is associated with an increase in mechanical shock transmitted through tibia (Byrne & Cox, 1997; Perry & La Fortune, 1995)

Correlation between lack of STJ pronation and shock induced musculokeletal pathology?

Implications for manufacture of foot orthoses


Shock attenuation Ankle joint

Eccentric contraction of anterior compartment muscles combined with plantarflexion during contact period (heel-toe walking)


Effect of foot position at initial contact on heel strike transient

Maximum amplitude of the transient stress wave produced at initial contact during running (accelerometers attached to tibia) is reduced by 33% for toe striking compared to heel striking.

Thought to increase the duration/time over which the velocity of body mass changes at initial contact


Mechanism of shock attenuation: toe-striking

Toe striking (compared to heel striking) causes more inverted foot position/STJ and plantarflexed ankle joint at initial contact

At forefoot contact, posterior leg muscles undergo eccentric contraction (to slow the velocity of the heel hitting floor). Hence, rest of body descends more slowly towards ground under control of anti-pronators/posterior leg muscles.

Force produced at initial contact is dissipated over a longer period of time

Transient stress wave produced through tibia is attenuated


Other considerations

Toe striking: facilitates increased velocity of running and shock attenuation BUT.. muscular demand (fatigue) and possible pathology within foot (forefoot strikes ground and is decelerated abruptly)

?Accelerometers placed along metatarsal shafts?


Passive mechanisms of shock attenuation

Body tissues acts as passive shock attenuating devices through their viscoelastic behaviour (Pratt ; Clin Biomech 1989; 4(1): 51-7)

 

Passive shock attenuation during the gait cycle

Elasticity of various body tissues is thought to contribute to shock attenuation

Bone (Following impact the adult femur can lose up to 1 cm in length as a result of bowing and elastic deformation)

Cartilage and synovial fluid

Soft tissues such as heel pads, menisci, intervertebral discs (IVDs)


Calcaneal fat pad

Soft tissues of foot act as a first in a series of shock absorbers

Calcaneal fat pad reduces shock transferred through tibia by up to 25% (Subotnick, 1997)

Calcaneal padding 18 mm thick (range 13-21 mm) and consists of fat enclosed within micro and macro- chambers

Calcaneal fat pad - clinical applications

Heel pain may be attributable to reduced shock absorptive capacity of the calcaneal fat pad

Atrophy, trauma, ageing, systemic (collagen) diseases

Pathological conditions and the heel strike transient

Excessive impulsive forces have been linked with a variety of complaints including headaches, plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinitis, degenerative joint disease and low back pain


Effect of foot type on heel strike transient

Ogon et al. (1999)

Acceleration amplitude and rate at spine (L3 spinal process) significantly lower in high-arch group compared to low-arch group during running

Suggests high arch feet are better shock attenuators


Artificial shock attenuation

'The support surface, footwear/insoles, and the body constitute a three component system of which the body is the dynamic adaptive component...Physical tests of shoe components including innersoles are not valid predictors of their effects on human locomotion. This is true of shock attenuation materials in which case wide variations in density fail to have predicted effects on shock attenuation.'

(Frederick (1986). Journal of Sports Sciences 4: 169-184)

 

Effects of:

insoles/orthotic materials

surfaces

shoes


Artificial Shock Attenuation: Insoles

Poron (PPT) & Plastazoate® are commonly used as top covers for foot orthoses or as shoe inserts

PPT reduces transient stress wave by 15%

Plastazoate® is ineffective (Pratt. Long term comparison of some shock attenuating insoles. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 1990: 59-62)

Viscolelastic shoe inserts have been shown to reduce

the amplitude of the heel strike transient at tibia by 40% (Voloshin & Wosk. Influence of artificial shock-absorbers on human gait. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1981; 160: 52-56

the amplitude and frequency of heel strike transient at sacrum, and symptoms in people with lower back pain (Wosk & Voloshin. Low back pain: Conservative treatment with artificial shock absorbers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 145-148.)


Artificial Shock Attenuation: Surfaces

The transient stress wave produced at heel contact is influenced by the surface

Accelerations (Ac) grass < Ac asphalt = Ac synthetic track. Accelerations measured at the hip and head remained constant across surfaces showing body protects the trunk and head from large shock waves by dampening the applied load in the lower extremities (Unold. Acceleration on different surfaces. Track Technique 1977; 69:211)


Artificial Shock Attenuation: Shoes

Amplitude of transient stress waves (accelerometers attached to tibia)

reduced by 36% in shod (leather soled shoes, athletic shoes) conditions compared to the barefoot condition (LaFortune & Henning. Clin Biomech 1992; 7: 181-184).

halved (from 5 g to 2.5 g) with compliant "shock absorbing" heels compared to barefoot

reduced by a further 10% in athletic shoes compared to leather soles shoes (LaFortune & Henning. Clin Biomech 1992; 7: 181-184)

Suggests that kinematic control & confinement of heel pad (leather soled shoes) as well as compliant shoes (athletic "shock absorbing" shoes) increase cushioning in vivo


Impact Reduction: Shoes

Athletic shoes are often promoted and purchased for their superior cushioning properties

Do more expensive athletic shoes reduce injuries?

'The notion that impact can be moderated through the use of cushioning (reduction of the amplitude of impact forces) is invalid in humans' (Robbins et al. Do soft shoes improve running shoes. Biomechanics April 1998: 47-55.

Impact (vertical GRF) remains constant when humans run/jump with cushioned midsoles of Shore A 30 or harder regardless of manufacturer, cost, model.

Shoes with relatively soft midsoles (Shore A < 30) are associated with increased impact

Effects of such shoes on heel strike transient (shock attenuation) is unclear

Relationship between cushioning, stability, and impact forces (Robbins Hypothesis)


Summary

Impact forces/GRFs - heel strike transient & impact peak

Measurement of impact forces

Mechanisms of shock attenuation

active & passive

Association b/w excessive impulsive forces & pathology

Artificial shock attenuation

insoles/surfaces/shoes

Robbins hypothesis (cushioning)

References:

Pratt, D.J. Mechanisms of shock attenuation via the lower extremity during running. Clin Biomech. 1989; 4: 51-57.

Collins, J.J. & Whittle, M.W. Impulsive forces during walking and their clinical implications. Clin Biomech. 1989; 4: 179-187.

Robbins et al. Do soft shoes improve running shoes. Biomechanics 1998; April: 47-55.

 


Content Approved by: Head of Podiatry
Page maintained by: Podiatry Webmaster
Last Updated: August 20th, 2002