
|
 |
 |

Department
of Podiatry
Clinical
Gait Analysis
 |
 |
Gait
analysis - why bother ?
- static
measurements may be invalid indicators of dynamic function
- 'the only way to assess a dynamic structure is dynamically'
- see Knutzen and Price (1994), Hamill et al (1989)
- can be used prior to static assessment to 'focus' on particular
areas of interest or - requires a lot of practice
- movements take place in a fraction of a second
|
Gait analysis
- how
-
systematic approach
- head to toe
- check for asymmetries
Treadmills
-
useful adjunct to overground walking evaluation
- benefits: continuous, videotape: replay, frame-by-frame, can also observe
sagittal plane, good for patient education
Problems with treadmills
- expense
- safety
- may not be appropriate for patients with balance difficulties / children
- gait alterations: inconsistent: may over-predict or under-predict overground
walking style, flat-footed weight acceptance, forward trunk lean, medial
roll-off, rather than active propulsion through 1st MPJ, shorter stride
length, higher stride rate
- may not be a valid indicator of normal walking
Reliability
Krebs et al. (1985)
- 3 'expert' observers rated videotaped gait kinematics of 15 children with
lower limb disabilities
- asked to note significant abnormalities in gait
- total agreement occured in 2/3 of cases
- convenient, but only moderately reliable technique
Keenan and Bach (1996)
- 4 experienced clinicians assessed videotaped rearfoot function of 24 subjects
- intra-tester reliability was good, inter-tester reliability was poor
- intra-tester reliability improved with experience
Things
to look for
- need to
remember normal timing of events
- look for asymmetries / abnormal degrees of motion
- try to concentrate on one aspect at a time
- categorise rather than quantify, and only record if clearly significant
- specific pathomechanical considerations: abductory twist, extensor substitution,
flexor stabilisation, angle of gait
1. Abductory twist
During midstance, the pelvis begins to externally rotate from its most
internal position. With this external rotation, the foot should normally
be undergoing supination in preparation for propulsion, leading to external
tibial rotation. However, if in midstance the foot remains pronated or
continues to pronate, the tibia is held in an internally rotated position.
The external rotation of the femur places a large torque on the internally
rotated tibia, so as the heel leaves the ground the pronated STJ cannot
hold the tibia in internal rotation any longer and an external rotatory
twist occurs at the metatarsal heads (forefoot abducts, heel adducts).
An abductory twist can be observed from posterior (as evidenced by heel
adduction following heel lift) and anterior (abductory twist around first
MPJ as patient approaches you).
2. 'Too many toes' sign
The normal angle of gait is approximately 5-10 degress of out-toeing,
so when viewing the foot from posterior you should be able to see 1.5
to 2 toes lateral to the heel. If you can observe more than 1-2 toes,
a 'too many toes' sign exists which indicates either a larger than normal
angle of gait or excessive forefoot abduction associated with excessive
STJ pronation. Excessive forefoot abduction can be differentially diagnosed
from a large AoG as with a large AoG the lateral border of the foot will
be straight, whereas with forefoot abduction it will be concave.
3. Resupination
The STJ should begin to supinate in late midstance in preparation for
propulsion. This is evidenced by heel inversion, external tibial rotation
(probably the easiest to observe) and elevation of the medial longitudinal
arch. If these features are not observed or occur later than the end of
midstance, the foot has remained in a pronated position for longer than
is normal. A lack of resupination often leads to a medial roll-off during
propulsion and may be evidenced by HK on the medial aspect of the first
MPJ and IPJ.
Summary
- gait analysis
is complex, highly subjective and only moderately reliable
- 'even the most experienced practitioner will have difficulty avoiding
seeing what he wants to see'
- however, reliability improves with experience and static measurements
alone are poor predictors of dynamic function
- gait analysis is a useful adjunct to clinical measurement
References
Hamill J,
Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpatrick (1989) Relationship between selected
static and dynamic measures. Clinical Biomechanics 4(4): 217-225.
Knutzen KM, Price A (1994) Lower extremity static and dynamic relationships
with rearfoot motion in gait. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical
Association 84(4): 171-180.
Michaud TC (1993) Foot orthoses and other forms of conservative foot
care. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, P.188-191.
NB: Walking man graphic taken from the clinical
gait analysis web page of Chris Kirtley (By the way, Chris
Kirley's site on CGA is definitely worth checking out).
Links
to relevant web pages
Three dimensional
motion analysis of the foot and ankle
|
 |