![]() |
Health Sciences |
![]() |
School of Human Communication SciencesIntegrating Functional Communication Therapy into RehabilitationThe Road Home: Integrating Functional Communication Therapy into RehabilitationContents
AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all those who contributed to the development of this manual. A special thanks is extended to Donna McNeill-Brown from La Trobe University, as well as Bronwyn Cox and Anna Volkmer from The Royal Melbourne Hospital for their supervision, feedback and support throughout the duration of this project. The group would also like to thank the numerous clinicians, from Victoria, Tasmania and Queensland, who provided them with extremely valuable ideas, resources and suggestions. Their expertise and clinical reasoning provided a platform for the development of this manual. Finally the authors are in much appreciation to Kate Cutler for her contribution to the graphic design and printing of the manual. The Road Home: Integrating Functional Communication Therapy into Rehabilitation This manual addresses the transition from hospital to home for client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) with a specific focus on language. It is targeted at student Speech Pathologists, Speech Pathology graduates and those re-entering the field of adult neurogenic communication. This manual aims to tackle the emerging area of functional communication in the rehabilitation setting, through addressing both theory and practice of therapy goals. The content within this manual was informed by the current literature, clinicians currently working in the field and personal experience from clinical placements. The research therefore involved a literature review, interviewing numerous clinicians and utilising clinical experience. There was also intent to interview individual’s with an ANCD, however this was unachievable due to policies and time constraints. One area of concern that has arisen is the issue of copyright. Currently group members are in the process of obtaining permission to use several figures in the manual. This is especially relevant if the project is to be marketed. Furthermore, the issues of ownership and distribution would need to be addressed. At this stage, these figures have not been included in the manual, however, each figure can be obtained through the corresponding references provided. PrefaceThis manual addresses the transition from hospital to home for client’s with acquired neurologicalcommunicative disorders (ANCD) with a specific focus on language. It is targeted at student Speech Pathologists, Speech Pathology graduates and those re-entering the field of adult neurogenic communication. This manual aims to tackle the emerging area of functional communication in the rehabilitation setting, through addressing both theory and practice of therapy goals. The content within this manual was informed by the current literature, clinicians currently working in the field and personal experience from clinical placements. The research therefore involved a literature review, interviewing numerous clinicians and utilising clinical experience. There was also intent to interview individual’s with an ANCD, however this was unachievable due to policies and time constraints. One area of concern that has arisen is the issue of copyright. Currently group members are in the process of obtaining permission to use several figures in the manual. This is especially relevant if the project is to be marketed. Furthermore, the issues of ownership and distribution would need to be addressed. At this stage, these figures have not been included in the manual, however, each figure can be obtained through the corresponding references provided. IntroductionPart APart A is designed as an informational package that details important features for a successful transition from hospital to home of individual’s with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD). It is divided into six sections that highlight significant aspects of therapy that facilitate more effective and efficient rehabilitation. Part A aims to detail some of the theoretical considerations of therapy in the rehabilitation setting, providing a background of knowledge for the clinician to develop their clinical skills upon. Part BPart B is the practical segment of the manual. It details twelve core functional goals that aim to represent a wide range of communication activities of daily living. It is proposed as a broad set of guidelines to assist clinicians in shaping therapy in the rehabilitation setting. These goals were developed through the literature, looking specifically in the areas of ensuring client safety, expressing needs and wants, reducing social isolation and anxiety, increasing quality of life and re-integration into the community. Input of relevant goals to include was also provided by numerous Speech Pathologists currently working in the rehabilitation setting. Each goal is accompanied by:
It is important to note that Part B does not contain an exhaustive list of goals. Moreover, by following principles of individualised therapy every goal will be not be relevant for every client and not every step within the goals will be appropriate for all clients. However, this manual aims to assist clinicians in targeting functional goals for clients by providing some general guidelines and activities that can be implemented in the clinical setting. PART A - Information SectionThe Road Home: Integrating Functional Communication Therapy into Rehabilitation This section of the manual will focus on the main theoretical frameworks that underlie therapy decisions when preparing client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) for the transition from hospital to home. The importance of utilising theoretical frameworks coincides with the increasing need to provide evidence-based practice for speech pathology interventions (Fucetola, Tucker, Blank & Corbetta, 2005; Ratner, 2006). Moreover, it is becoming essential that clinicians prove that rehabilitation is purposeful and is making a difference in the everyday life of the client (Lubinski, 2001). Therefore the frameworks will be analysed with a functional focus, which is vital during the transition phase. This section will also include some therapy ideas/ techniques for the different approaches. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) FrameworksThis section of the manual will focus on the main theoretical frameworks that underlie therapy decisions when preparing client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) for the transition from hospital to home. The importance of utilising theoretical frameworks coincides with the increasing need to provide evidence-based practice for speech pathology interventions (Fucetola, Tucker, Blank & Corbetta, 2005; Ratner, 2006). Moreover, it is becoming essential that clinicians prove that rehabilitation is purposeful and is making a difference in the everyday life of the client (Lubinski, 2001). Therefore the frameworks will be analysed with a functional focus, which is vital during the transition phase. This section will also include some therapy ideas/ techniques for the different approaches. Adapted from World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. What is the ICF model?The ICF model is a framework specially formulated to address functional health (Ma, Threats & Worrall, 2008). Functional health implies that an individual can carry out their activities of daily living (e.g. dressing, toileting or communicating) and participate in society (e.g. attend school or work). The model can therefore be applied when addressing physical, cognitive and communication skills of a client with a health disorder. The parameters include:
Example - Aphasia
Applying the ICF model to functional therapy
Functional Therapy Ideas
Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA) Adapted from Kay, J., Lesser, R. & Coldheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. What is the PALPA model?It is an approach towards understanding cognitive functions such as recognising, listening, speaking and writing via analysis of presenting impairments (Ellis & Young, 1988). This cognitive neuropsychology approach is based on the treatment principles that the origin and nature of the impairment/s can be identified and then the damaged component’s relationship with connecting processing components is considered (Byng, 1988). The approach is influential in the assessment, investigation, and treatment of word production difficulties in language disorders (Wilshire, 2007). Functions of the components (Kay, Lesser & Coldheart, 1992; Ellis & Young, 1988):
Applying the PALPA model to functional therapy
Functional Therapy Ideas
Functional ApproachesLife Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA)
Therapy Techniques:
Social Approach
Therapy techniques:
Environmental Systems Approach
Therapy techniques:
ConclusionTo achieve functional therapeutic success a combination of clinical judgement and the relevant components of varying approaches can be implemented. The most important concept of functional based therapy is to ensure that the client’s desired goals are being targeted (Wallace, Evans, Arnold & Hux, 2007). Discussing the client’s relevant communicative abilities of daily living is a starting point (Holland, Frattali & Fromm, 1998). The key areas of functional therapy are independence and social integration, caregiver burden, caregiver education, community education, satisfaction with quality of life, productivity and transportation (Mc Cabe etal., 2007; Fraas. Balz & DeGrauw, 2007). Achievement of these goals may require combining traditional restorative approaches with functional therapy approaches or may involve something new and different. ReferencesAustralian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2003). ICF Australian user guide. Version 1.0. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Bying, S. (1988). Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(6), 629-676. Chapey, R., Duchan, J.F., Elman, R.J., Garcia, L.J., Kagan, A., Lyon, J.G., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future. In Chapey, R. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders(4th ed.) (pp. 235-245). Baltimore; Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Cruice, M. (2008). The contribution and impact of the international classification of functioning, disability and health on quality of life in communication disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 38-49. Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, England: Erlbaum. Fraas, M., Balz, M., & DeGrauw, W. (2007). Meeting the long-term needs of adults with acquired brain injury through community-based programming. Brain Injury, 21(12), 1267-1281. Fucetola, R., Tucker, F., Blank, K., & Corbetta, M. (2005). A process for translating evidence-base aphasia treatment into clinical practice. Aphasiology, 19(3), 411-422 . Holland, A.L., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1998). Communicative abilities in daily living (CADL 2). Texas: Proed Publishers Inc. Howe, T.J. (2008). The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 27-37. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coldheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lafond, D., DeGiovani, R., Joanette, Y., Ponzio, J., & Sarno, M. (Eds.) (1993). Living with aphasia: Psychosocial issues. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing. Lubinski, R. (2001). Environmental systems approach to adult aphasia. In Chapey, R. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed.) (pp. 269-296). Baltimore; Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Ma, E. P.-M., Threats, T.T., & Worrall, L.E. (2008). An introduction to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for speech-language pathology: Its past, present and future. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 2-8. McCabe, P., Lippert, C., Weiser, M., Hilditch, M., Hartridge, C., & Villamere, J. (2007). Community reintegration following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 21(2), 231-257. O’Halloran, R., & Larkins, B. (2008). The ICF activities and participation related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 18-26. Ratner, N.B. (2006). Evidence-based practice: An examination of its ramifications for the practice of speech-language pathology. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 257-267. Sandin, K., Cifu, D., & Noll, S. (1994). Stroke rehabilitation. Psychological and social implications. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, S52-S55. Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001). Social approaches to aphasia intervention. In Chapey, R. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed.) (pp. 246-268). Baltimore; Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J.S. (2007). Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology, 21(1), 81-97. Stalnacke, B-M. (2007). Community integration, social support and life satisfaction in relation to symptoms 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 21(9), 933-942. Threats, T.T. (2008). Use of the ICF for clinical practice in speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 50-60. Wallace, S.E., Evans, K., Arnold, T. & Hux, K., (2007). Functional brain injury rehabilitation: Survivor experiences reported by families and professionals. Brain injury, 21(13), 1371-1384. Wilshire, C.E. (2007). Cognitive neuropsychological approaches to word production in aphasia: Beyond boxes and arrows. Aphasiology, 22 (10), 1019-1053. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Goal SettingEffective goal setting is an essential component of rehabilitation (Duff, 2004). Previous studies have shown that a client’s involvement in the goal setting process is a strong indicator to the therapy’s effectiveness in ensuring lasting change (Duff, 2004). Individual involvement in goal setting has been found to increase adherence, goal attainment and client satisfaction (Duff, 2004). Furthermore, individual involvement facilitates a sense of power, enabling the client to adequately manage the consequences of their injuries, as well as strongly contributing to greater physical and cognitive gains in therapy (Holliday, 2007). Setting Functional Communication GoalsFocusing on functional life goals influences a client’s compliance and motivation to succeed in therapy (Nair, 2003). Functional life goals are the desired states that people wish to obtain and maintain or avoid (Nair, 2003). Functional life goals in rehabilitation are generally derived from the client’s pre-morbid status (Nair, 2003). These can be obtained directly from the client or from the client’s relatives or friends (Nair, 2003). Cognitive impairments and lack of insight can interfere with assessment of life goals, inhibiting one’s ability to express their goals to relevant medical staff (Nair, 2003). For neurological patients, it is vital to spend sufficient time in establishing and setting goals (Holliday, 2007). Establishing a reliable yes/no response and requesting clients to make simple choices will assist setting relevant goals for therapy (Nair, 2003). On admission to rehabilitation, it is important to determine what areas of life are the greatest concerns to the client (Nair, 2003). Those areas identified as greatest concern can then be used to formulate a hierarchy of goals to work from. Success in rehabilitation largely depends on the client’s motivation levels (Nair, 2003). This greatly relies on the consensus between a client’s life goals and goals set by the rehabilitation team (Nair, 2003). For this reason, it is the responsibility of the medical team to tailor goals specifically to the individual’s needs. Communication between the medical team and the client needs to be carried out to ensure the client understands and agrees that goals set in therapy coincide with their life goals (Nair, 2003). It is common for clients to feel unable to express their wants and needs in therapy, and for that reason individualisation is often missed in the therapy setting (Schulman – Green, 2006). However, a study performed by Schulman – Green (2006) found that with increased prompting, all clients expressed very specific, individual goals ranging from walking up stairs to attending a concert. Examples of how to set goals specific to a client’s life goals is further discussed in the “Individualised Therapy” section of the manual. The following table developed from Nair (2003) describes how to set and carry out life goals in rehabilitation: Figure 1 Rehabilitation programme based on life goals. [ not included in the PDF file] Nair, K. S. (2003). Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 199. Another component to goal setting in rehabilitation is that goals need to be specific and set to an achievable, yet challenging level (Duff, 2004). It is vital to also ensure that goals set in therapy are measurable by an evidence-based scale (Siegert, 2004). An example of a measurable scale is the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures (AusToms) (Perry, 2004). AusToms is a valid and reliable measure that was developed by clinicians for clinicians in establishing baseline measures, intra-and-inter profession comparisons and evaluation of intervention (Perry, 2004). Studies have shown an association between setting measurable goals within onset of skill acquisition, also contributing to the development of positive psychological benefits mediating between task ability and performance (Duff, 2004). Goal proximity and the setting of both short and long term goals have been found to increase performance on task and set lasting, self-regulating behaviour change (Duff, 2004). Ineffective goal setting and rehabilitation practice does occur, as described in a study by Duff (2004). Such reason for goal non-achievement was predominately caused by staff and/or organisational issues, followed by client issues (Duff, 2004). Another factor for failed goal setting is due to the lack of rapport built between clinician and client (Holliday, 2007). This highlights the importance of effective teamwork in interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary teams, as failure can and does impact on the client’s success in achieving goals (Duff, 2004). A study performed by Hersh (2007) found that although clients did find therapy useful, they were unable to describe the rationale behind completing individual activities in therapy. Completion and achievement of specific therapy exercises was described as the main reason for improvement in therapy, followed closely by ongoing encouragement to achieve goals (Hersh, 2007). Other participants reported therapy being too theoretical and irrelevant to their individual needs (Hersh, 2007). Functional communication goals in therapy directly assist in the client’s personal needs and pre-morbid status (Siegert, 2003). Furthermore, targeting functional communication allows clarification of the importance of therapy to clients. It is important to recognise that goal setting involves more than simply setting a goal and achieving it through exercises (Siegert, 2003). It is vital to provide clients with accurate descriptions of what the set goal is, and why it is being targeted in therapy, as well as providing appropriate encouragement (Hersh, 2007). Nair (2003) established a set of guidelines when setting functional goals in therapy. These are described below:
Another guideline that has been advocated for setting goals in rehabilitation is the SMART model (Siegert, 2003). This model states that an ideal goal should be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-limited (Siegert, 2003). It also suggests that goal setting is a dynamic process that may require online changes and adjustments during the rehabilitation stay (Siegert, 2003). Discharge from RehabilitationIt is important to acknowledge that following completion of rehabilitation therapy, adequate discharge procedures are carried out to ensure client satisfaction and confidence (Hersh, 2007). A study completed by Hersh (2007) on client opinions following the discharge of therapy of clients with aphasia, found clients had unpredictable rationales to timing and reason for discharge. Rationales were generally placed in one of three categories: client related, based on the client’s assessment and progress; therapist related, based on the therapist’s perceptions; and externally imposed influences that were any reasons judged by clients to be out of the therapist’s control (Hersh, 2007). All rationales described by clients were due to a lack of communication on discharge, causing uncertainty and confusion (Hersh, 2007). These findings have suggested that extra effort and consideration need to be applied on discharge of clients from rehabilitation (Hersh, 2007). This can be achieved through the implementation of the following factors:
ReferencesDuff, J., Evans, M. J., & Kennedy, P. (2004). Goal planning: A retrospective audit of rehabilitation process and outcome. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 275 – 286. Hersh, D. (2007). How do people with aphasia view their discharge from therapy? Aphasiology, 1 – 20. Holliday, R. C., Ballinger, C., & Playford, E. D. (2007). Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: Patients’ perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(5), 389 – 394. Nair, K. S. (2003). Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 192 – 202. Perry, A. (2004). Therapy Outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusToms. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 285 – 291. Schulman-Green, D. J., Naik, A. D., Bradley, E. H., McCorkle, R., & Bogardus, S. T. J. (2006). Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients. Patient Education and Counselling. Siegert, R., & Taylor, W. (2004). Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1 – 8. Individualised TherapyThere is no one specific manual or set of guidelines, which inform clinicians of the exact steps required in providing therapy for individual’s with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD). This is because people and their deficits differ so greatly. There are many factors, which need to be taken into account when developing therapy activities for an individual with an ANCD i.e. client’s functional level, type of brain injury (the site and extent of their injury), individual goals, client’s life stage & expectations for discharge e.g. do they require supervision or are they able to return to work. All these key factors differ significantly for individuals, and consequently therapy should be client-centred and focus on meeting the differing needs of each client. This is what is referred to as individualised therapy. It is often very difficult for individual’s with an ANCD to generalise what has been learnt in therapy and then apply it across different contexts (Ponsford, Sloan & Snow, 1999). Therefore, goals must be practical and focus on activities performed in everyday life (Ponsford, et al., 1999). When developing client-centred therapy activities for an individual, it is critical they are as functional and as relevant to the client as possible (Ponsford, et al., 1999). Impaired self-awareness is a common symptom for individual’s with an ANCD (Noé, Ferri, Caballero & Villodre, 2005). It has been reported that many individual’s with ANCD’s lack insight and have difficulty seeing the relevance of therapy (Ponsford, et al., 1999). Therefore by focusing on everyday living and helping individuals to see the relevance of therapy activities, maximises the likelihood of client participation in therapy (Noé, et al., 2005). Once a clinician has recognised the importance of developing therapy that is individualised, the next step is to implement and conduct the appropriate therapy. So how do clinicians go about shaping therapy that is individualised for their clients? The following information provides a brief recommended overview of important aspects needed to be considered. Conducting Individualised TherapyTherapy must be tailored to the individual with an ANCD (Worrall, 1999). Therapy for an individual should be shaped in such a way that the clinician performs therapy activities in the context that is as close as possible to real life (Worrall, 1999). This involves who the client talks with regularly, common communicative environments & frequently used communication aids i.e. telephone (Worrall, 1999). Individual Goals for TherapyBefore therapy can begin it is important to find out what activities clients took part in pre-morbidly, but now have difficulty with because their impairments are impeding on their participation (i.e. return to work, buy the weekly shopping, pay bills, talk to friends etc.). This information will then be used to form therapy that is individualised and focused on meeting the client’s needs. If a client’s level of insight has been affected, then their aims for therapy will need assistance and input from the clinician and their primary communication partners. Research conducted by Noé et al. (2005) found that improvement in self awareness was associated with participation in cognitive and functional tasks. This highlights the need for therapy to be functional and relevant to the individual. For a more comprehensive look at individual goals for therapy, refer to the “Goal Setting” section. Communication PartnersThe involvement of primary communication partners, who the client regularly talks with or depends on for communication in therapy is both realistic and functional. Rather than basing therapy on improving the client’s communication difficulties by interacting solely with the clinician, the client can interact with the people they will be communicating with on a regular basis. This functional approach to therapy also exposes the communication partners to the therapy process and clinicians are able to model helpful strategies for effective communication (Ponsfor, et al., 1999). Many individual’s with an ANCD need to adjust to different levels of functioning, which may be significantly different to how they previously lived (Marsh & Knight, 1991). Some never return to their pre-morbid functioning and may have lasting and disabling cognitive and psychosocial deficits, which will need assistance for the rest of their lives (Marsh & Knight, 1991). Therefore, it is important that their familiar communication partners are educated in how best to assist with their communication. The importance of communication partners is discussed in more detail in the “Communication Partners” section. Common Communicative EnvironmentsFor therapy to be functional and individualised, it is suggested that one establishes the best context and environment to conduct therapy (Worrall, 1999). Clients can accomplish tasks at home that they cannot otherwise do at hospital and this is why rehabilitation in the home is successful (Worrall, 1999). If conducting therapy in their home is difficult to arrange, then the clinic setting can be created in a way that is as near to real life as possible. This can be arranged by asking the client to invite their communication partners to therapy and bring in any aids. Aids are defined as a prop, which enhances communication (Worrall, 1999). The fact still remains that clients should have more opportunities to practise therapy outside the hospital setting. Finding the right setting to conduct therapy will assist with the successfulness of therapy for an individual with an ANCD. Environments may include home, work, local shopping centres or cafés, schools or train stations. Select environments, which the client commonly spends the majority of their day, as these will most likely be the places where the most communication will occur. Frequently Used Communication AidsCommunication aids or props are also a functional aspect, which is important to include into therapy (Worrall, 1999). Aids such as telephones, keyboards, books, recipes, telephone bills and bus timetables are some of the props that can be used. It is critical that each aid is relevant to the client. That is, clinics may have phones, however they may be different to the one the person commonly uses at home. Irrespective of the aid, ensure that it is commonly used by the client and it is from their own environment, as individualised therapy is the key (Worrall, 1999). If rehabilitation cannot be accessed in the home, ask the client to bring their communication aids from home into the clinic in an effort to make the environment as close to real life as possible (Worrall, 1999). Taking into account the above information, an example of individualised and functional therapy would be the following:
Once these important aspects have been established, the therapy task itself can be developed. The task in this situation is to buy a coffee. The task will involve a greeting (Hi, how are you?), a request (Can I please have one latté?), money exchange (handing over the correct money and receiving the correct change) and a response (Thank you.). The task itself involves a variety of stages, which will need more detailed focus in therapy. This will be discussed in greater length in the Communication Acts. ConclusionThe most important aspect of therapy is to establish functional tasks that are relevant for the individual. Therapy needs to be individualised for every client. Therapy activities may vary widely amongst clients, which is what individualised therapy entails. This will ensure the optimum outcome is achieved for the client, which is the ultimate goal in therapy. ReferencesMarsh, N.V., & Knight, R.G. (1991). Behavioural assessment of social competence following severe head injury. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand: Psychology Press. Noé, E., Ferri, J., Caballero, M.C., & Villodre, R. et al. (2005). Self awareness after acquired brain injury; Predictors and rehabilitation. Journal of Neurology. New York. 252(2), 168. Ponsford, J., Sloan, S., & Snow, P. (1999). Traumatic brain injury – Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. East Sussex, UK: Taylor & Francis Group. Worrall, L. (1999). FCTP: Functional communication therapy planner. Bicester, Oxon: Winslow Press. Therapy Communication PartnersThis section of the manual will focus on the use of communication partners in therapy for individual’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) to facilitate successful transition from hospital to home. The use of communication partners in the rehabilitation setting and the involvement of significant others in therapy will be discussed. The use, positive and negative aspects of communication strategies to facilitate communication partners will also be considered. Use of Communication Partners in TherapyAn article by Correll, Van Steenbrugge and Scholten (2004) discussed the importance of targeting communication in therapy through social activities with familiar communication partners, as they allow for optimal outcomes. This is achieved through training of skills and compensatory strategies, as well as targeting optimal communication rather than linguistic accuracy (Correll et al., 2004). Family members are the most commonly used communication partners in therapy, aside from the clinician, because they are usually the person/people the client interacts with most. Using a significant other within the therapy intervention reduces the stress, loneliness and depression that the client and significant other may experience (Correll et al., 2004). Numerous studies referring to the relationship between quality of life and young adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) emphasise the importance of involving the client’s larger social network in therapy. A larger social network assists in family and client adjustment to disability and associated challenges (Morton & Wehman, 1995). These studies found that the pre-morbid social relationships clients held, often had deteriorated to the point that they no longer associated with their previous social network, and failed to be involved in any new social networks up to two years post-discharge (Morton & Wehman, 1995). Therefore therapy should consider the use of communication partners from the client’s larger social network. Involving a variety of communication partners in a client’s therapy is used across the Speech Pathology discipline. For example it is common to involve the parent of a child receiving speech pathology intervention (Wetherby, 2002). Like wise it is common to use a variety of speaking partners in adult stuttering therapy to generalise outcomes from the clinical environment across contexts (Block, Onslow, Packman, Gray & Dacakis, 2005). Therefore the use of a hierarchical system of interacting with different communication partners can increase a client’s ability to communicate in social situations (Block et al., 2005). In turn, this reduces the risk of social isolation, and increases independence. The following is an example of ten goals using a hierarchical system of communication partners in therapy:
The goals mentioned above are highly dependant on the client, their wishes, the extent of the communication disorder and the amount of intervention received. Appropriateness of communication partners will differ for each client and goal. Refer to “Individualised Therapy” section for further information. Use of Familiar and Unfamiliar Communication PartnersCommunication partners have been identified in the literature to reduce the social isolation and anxiety that frequently results from an ANCD (Rayner & Marshall, 2003). Furthermore, the inclusion of both familiar and unfamiliar communication partners in intervention utilises the recommendations of the ICF framework and the Social model (refer to “Frameworks” section). However, Simmons-Mackie, Kearns & Potechin (2005), found that without specific training, the benefits of a communication partner are limited and can be detrimental to therapy outcomes. Therefore, when conducting therapy with communication partners, specific training needs to be implemented. Observation of a therapy session and informational counselling in isolation are insufficient. Many studies have described the communication between individual’s with an ANCD and their communication partners. Simmons-Mackie et al. (2005) suggest that family members are not always the most effective communication partners, as they find it difficult to adapt to a new style of interaction with their spouse/friend after an ANCD. There is also evidence in the literature that suggests training of unfamiliar communication partners has a positive effect on communication and reacquisition of communication skills for individual’s with ANCD’s (Ylvisaker, 2006). Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the training of unfamiliar communication partners reduces feelings of social isolation in individual’s with an ANCD (Rayner & Marshall, 2003). Therefore, it is important to consider the client’s social environment outside of therapy to maximise their expressive output and so increase their ease of communication within the community (Ylvisaker, 2006). There are many strategies that can be suggested to a communication partner to facilitate communication. A range of generic positive and negative communication strategies are described in the following table. These can be applied to any therapy goal.
A summary of communication strategies as adapted from Simmons-Mackie & Kagan (1999). Communication Partners ConclusionThe use of communication partners in therapy has been shown throughout the literature to be best practice. However, it is important to acknowledge that sufficient training and education of strategies for communication partners are implemented. Without this training, therapy may break down and can have detrimental effects on the client’s outcomes, as well as the relationships with their communication partner/s. Once adequate training has been provided, positive functional outcomes can be attained. This results in increased client motivation and a decreased risk of social isolation, depression and anxiety. ReferencesBlock, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Gray, B., & Dacakis, G. (2005). Treatment of chronic stuttering: Outcomes of a student training clinic. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(4), 455-66. Correll, A., Van Steenbrugge, W., & Scholten, I. (2004). Communication between severely aphasic adults and partners: An early intervention. Acquiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing pathology, 6(2), 93-6. Morton, M., & Wehman, P. (1995). Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury, 9(1), 81-92. Rayner, H., & Marshall, J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(2), 149-64. Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (1999). Communication strategies used by good versus poor speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13(9-11) 807-20. Simmons-Mackie, N., Kearns, K., & Potechin, G. (2005). Treatment of aphasia through family member training. Aphasiology, 19(6) 583-93. Wetherby, A. (2002). Communication disorders in infants, toddlers and preschool children. In Shames, G. & Anderson, N. (Eds.) Human communication disorders: An introduction (6th ed.)(pp. 186-217). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Ylvisaker, M (2006). Self-Coaching: A Context-Sensitive, Person-Centred Approach to Social Communication after Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain impairment, 7(3), 246-58. Group TherapyGroup therapy is an important part of the rehabilitation process for individual’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD). Group therapy is an effective use of the clinician’s time and resources, has many communication benefits and most importantly facilitates transfer of skills from the rehabilitation setting into the home environment. This section will outline some of the relevant theory as to why group therapy is important, and then focus on considerations of clinical application of group therapy. Effective use of time/resourcesChapey (2001) suggests that in the context of reductions in reimbursement for clinical services and less time to treat our clients, group therapy approaches are becoming a significant aspect of client management. With increased pressure to cope with the demand for services, group therapy can be an extremely effective use of our health care resources. Benefits of groupsAlthough group therapy remains a controversial area, various studies have explored the efficacy of group therapy for individual’s with an ANCD and purported that group intervention is an effective means of treating speech language deficits (Aten, Caligiuri & Holland, 1982; Bloom, 1962; Elman, 2007; Elman & Bernstein-Ellis, 1999; Marshall, 1999; Wertz, Collins, Weiss, Kurtzke, Friden, Porch, West, Davis, Matovitch, Morley & Resurreccion, 1981). In addition to benefits in speech and language, several studies have found that group therapy resulted in numerous psychological and emotional gains. Participants developed an increased sense of personal destiny and confidence; decreased feelings of hopelessness; a lowered sense of victimisation and anger; and a greater sense of control and empowerment (Armengol, 1999). The groups were found to provide a sense of belonging to individuals that feel extreme social and emotional isolation; more effective coping strategies; behaviour rehearsal opportunities; and self-monitoring training (Delmonico, Hanley-Peterson & Englander, 1998). Improved ratings on measures of self esteem, social skills, self awareness, everyday memory and other cognitive skills have also been found in a variety of group programs described in the literature (Tate, 1997; Boake, 1991; Deaton, 1991; Onsworth, Mc Farland & Young, 2000). Transfer of skills – rehabilitation to homeThe group setting provides an important link between individualised treatment and the natural environment. It acts as a forum to facilitate generalisation of skills learnt in individual therapy to a variety of communication partners and contexts (Rollin, 2000). Establishing A Communication Group In The Rehabilitation SettingBelow are some basic considerations to take into account when establishing a communication group in the rehabilitation setting. These considerations have been developed in consultation with experienced clinicians working in the Metropolitan Melbourne rehabilitation setting. This is by no means an exhaustive list and it is important to note that each clinician will develop their own group in accordance to the needs of their clients and individual professional style. GoalsBefore establishing a communication group the clinician first needs to determine the purpose of the group. This will depend on the clients and the setting, however, it is important to have clear goals to build the group around. For example, is the purpose of the group to encourage social participation and conversation or perhaps transfer of strategies developed in individual therapy? In addition to overall group goals, individual goals should be developed with each group member. It is important that each client is aware of his or her personal goals for the group, both to maximise the effectiveness of the therapy and prevent clients from merely attending rather than participating. Types of groupsChapey (2001) describes several different types of groups that can be utilised for client’s with an ANCD. These include:
Depending on the needs of the clients, various aspects of the different types of groups can be incorporated. For example, the group can commence following direct therapy principles and then transform into a more indirect approach as clients develop different skills and goals. Criteria for participationExclusion and inclusion criteria of the participants need to be established. Depending on the purpose of the group, different aspects of the clients need to be considered. These may include, but are not limited to severity/type of impairment, age range, cultural influences, gender, aggressive behaviours, and non-English speaking backgrounds. The Speech Pathologist may wish to make this decision alone, however input from the medical and allied health team can assist in this process. The number of clients participating is also important. Will the numbers be capped; does the group have scope to expand? This will be influenced by the types of clients and group. However, to ensure that each member is receiving adequate support, eight participants may be a maximum to consider. Facilitator of the groupThe Speech Pathologist will obviously be the primary facilitator of the group, but depending on the complexities of the clients, the level of experience of the Speech Pathologist and support available, two clinicians may be preferable. If there is only one Speech Pathologist in the setting other allied health staff can be invaluable. Depending on their availability, Occupational Therapists or allied health assistants could act as a second facilitator. Evaluation measuresOutcome measures are a vital part of therapy and group therapy is no exception. How will client progress be evaluated? Important aspects to take into account include: at what level will the success be measured - reduction in impairment, increase in participation and/or successful completion of functional tasks. Will the measurement be formal, informal or a combination of both and if there are secondary facilitators, who will be responsible for these different measures? Some possibilities for evaluation include client reports, for example a participation scale or client questionnaire, as well as data collected by the Speech Pathologist. You may wish to develop a template to facilitate concise and time effective measurement. OtherThere are many smaller logistical considerations when developing a group that will not be discussed in detail in this manual, as they are setting and clinician specific. However, it is worthwhile to mention them briefly. The frequency of the group, length of the sessions and transfer of clients will depend upon the clients. Room bookings, timetabling, required materials (e.g. whiteboards) and documentation of attendance will vary according to the policies of the setting. ReferencesArmengol, C. G. (1999). A multimodal support group with hispanic traumatic brain injury survivors. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14(3) 233-246. Aten, J.L., Caligiuri, M.P., & Holland, A. (1982). The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 93-96. Bloom, L.M. (1962). A rationale for group treatment of aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 11-16. Boake, C. (1991). Social skills training following head injury. In J.S. Kreutzer & P.H. Wehman (Eds.), Cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Chapey, R. (Ed). (2001). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. Deaton, A.V. (1991). Group interventions for cognitive rehabilitation. In J.S. Kreutzer & P.H. Wehman (Eds.), Cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Delmonico, R.L., Hanley-Peterson, P., & Englander, J. (1998). Group psychotherapy for persons with traumatic brain injury: Management of frustration and substance abuse. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13(6) 10-22 . Elman, R. (2007). Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach. San Diego: Plural Publishing. Elman, R., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999). The efficacy of group communication treatment: Preliminary findings. Seminars in Speech & Language, 20(1), 65-72. 42 The Road Home: Integrating Functional Communication Therapy into Rehabilitation Marshall, R.C. (1999). Introduction to group treatment for aphasic patients: Decisions and management. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. Ownsworth, T.L., McFarland, K., & Young, R. (2000). Self-awareness and psychosocial functioning following acquired brain injury: An evaluation of a group support programme, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(5) 465 – 484. Rollin, W.J. (2004). Counselling individuals with communication disorders. Psychodynamic and family aspects (2nd Ed). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Tate, R.L. (1997). Beyond one-bun, two-shoe: Recent advances in the psychological rehabilitation of memory disorders after an acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 11(12), 907 – 918. Wertz, R.T., Collins, M.H., Weiss, D., Kurtzke, J.F., Friden, T., Porch, B.E., West, J.A., Davis, L., Matovitch, V., Morley, G.K., & Resurreccion, E. (1981). Veterans Administration cooperative study on aphasia: A comparison of individual and group treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 580-594. Approaches To Therapy: Multidisciplinary or Interdisciplinary?The importance of teamwork to providing therapy in the rehabilitation setting is crucial to optimising client outcomes. There are several approaches to providing therapy to clients, including the multidisciplinary approach and the interdisciplinary approach. The ApproachesA multidisciplinary approach is when professionals from varying disciplines work independently of one another to represent their own discipline (Davies, 2007). Team members work parallel alongside each other, but focus primarily on their own discipline. The client’s medical file is the primary means of communication amongst health care professionals (CAPC, 2008). In a multidisciplinary team, there is selected time spent discussing clients with all team members present. However, the ability to transfer skills and work collaboratively with allied health professionals is minimal. Currently, the multidisciplinary approach is commonly used by health care professionals in inpatient rehabilitation (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003). An interdisciplinary approach involves professionals from several disciplines working together and using formal channels of communication to share information and discuss results (Davies, 2007). There is possibility for an overlap in roles, however, this approach provides the client with multiple resources and a multi-skilled practitioner (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003). This coexistence and transfer of skills enables team members to “cover each other’s weaknesses and maximize each other’s strengths” (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003, para. 8). Furthermore, team members can facilitate the implementation of goals unique to every discipline (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003). In this approach, team members meet on a regular basis to discuss the needs of the client and to establish intervention strategies accordingly (CAPC, 2008). Goals for the client are set collaboratively to avoid group conflict regarding recommendations, timelines and goals (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003). Barriers to Service DeliveryOften time restraints do not permit professionals to see clients simultaneously, and logistically this can be challenging (Resource Centre on Ageing, 2008). Therefore, aspects of the multidisciplinary approach (as opposed to an interdisciplinary approach) remain the most widely used in the rehabilitation setting (Gardner, 2007). Instead, there should be flexibility in service delivery to support each client’s individual needs. Therefore, the focus should be on optimising the overall outcome for the client through best practice, as demonstrated by the interdisciplinary approach. However, funding is supplied to professions as a separate entity for specific purposes and does not support an interdisciplinary approach (Gardner, 2007). Also, for the interdisciplinary approach to be effective, there must be adequate communication amongst team members and minimal team conflict (The Medical Journal of Australia, 2003). Human service organisations, the Government and funding bodies do acknowledge that there is a need for a holistic and collaborative approach in health care service delivery (Gardner, 2007). The Medical Journal of Australia (2003) identified the interdisciplinary team approach as an effective model to be used in rehabilitation, however, it is currently not widely implemented across health care services. A Resource for Allied Health ProfessionalsInformal interviews were conducted with qualified Speech Pathologists currently working in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. This was to gain an understanding of what is required to improve outcome measures for individual’s with an acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD). Feedback given by some Speech Pathologists indicated that there is a lack of information provided to allied health professionals in regards to communicating with individual’s with ANCD’s and the role of a Speech Pathologist. Education about Speech Pathology for allied health professionals can be conducted in a variety of ways. Each rehabilitation facility conducts professional development differently. It must be acknowledged that most services do provide the opportunity for professionals to transfer their skills to other professions in a limited capacity. However, it was expressed that this was not adequate for allied heath professionals to develop a true understanding of communicating with individual’s with ANCD’s. It is believed that through gaining a better understanding of communication, health care professions will be able to:
Attached at the end of this section is a brochure that can be provided to allied health professionals to assist their service delivery. The brochure aims to provide basic strategies to improve the communication between the clinician and the client. It is hoped that it will not only assist allied health professionals, but will indirectly benefit clients, which is the ultimate objective. ReferencesCentre to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) (2008). Interdisciplinary care. Retrieved September 1, 2008 from http://64.85.16.230/educate/content.html Davies, S. (2007). Team around the child: Working together in early childhood. New South Wales: Oxford University Press. Gardner, F. (2007). Interdisciplinary professional practice: Current issues and prospects. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. The Medical Journal of Australia (2003). Team working: Palliative care as a model of interdisciplinary practice. Retrieved August 25, 2008 from http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/179_06_150903/cra10363_fm.html Resource Centre on Ageing. (2008). The interdisciplinary team: Improving the care of our elders. Retrieved September 5, 2008 from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~aging/HMS298.htm Speech Pathology: Communication
Speech Pathologists commonly treat individuals with:
If you have any further enquiries regarding these conditions, contact the Speech Pathologist working in your facility. General tips for communicating with individuals with acquired neurological communicative disorders
To assist communication for a client with memory difficulties
To assist communication for a client with difficulties in understanding
Speech Pathology: CommunicationTo assist communication for a client who has difficulty expressing their message
Considerations for communicating with individuals with acquired neurological communicative disorder
References
Developed by Jacqueline Bonney, Lucy Bransgrove, Shelley Coy, Lauren Cutler, Hayley Dell’oro and Mikayla Moroney (4th Year Student Speech Pathologists) Part B - Communication ActsEstablishing a reliable yes/no responseGoalTo be able to communicate a reliable yes/no response in a variety of contexts using speech or gesture. RationaleBeing able to communicate with a yes/no response is the most basic form of expression (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2005). The right to communicate is a fundamental and inclusive human right (Right to Communicate Group, 2002). It is therefore important for a client to have a reliable yes/no response to be able to express their basic needs and wants (Adler & Towne, 1981). Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityMeasurability for steps 1 and 2 is successful completion of the activity, as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure that the client understands the task. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. Assessment to include ten trials for the criterion to be measured from. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal will be considered when the client can express a reliable yes/no response through speech or gesture. This measure may require input from other allied health professionals (e.g. Physiotherapists, Occupational Therapists, etc…) and the client’s significant others to ensure the response is consistent and reliable. Establishing a reliable yes/no response Establishing a reliable yes/no response Steps to Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesAdler & Towne (1981). Looking out/looking in: Interpersonal communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co. Right to Communicate Group. (2002). The right to communicate organization. http://www.righttocommunicate.org/ Expressing basic needs & wantsGoalTo be able to express basic needs and wants in a short, simple sentence. RationaleBeing able to express basic needs and wants is an important skill for a person to be able to communicate (Shames & Anderson, 2002). Communication is one of the basic rights in humanity and therefore should be a priority for therapy (Shames & Anderson, 2002). By expressing requests, the client is more likely to have their needs and wants met, rather than them being incorrectly interpreted or ignored (Shames & Anderson, 2002). Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityOnce the goal of “establishing a reliable yes/no response” has been achieved, a further goal of expressing needs and wants can be targeted. Measurability for steps 1 and 2 is successful completion of the activity, as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure that the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. Assessment to include ten trials for the criterion to be measured from. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal will be considered when the client can consistently express short, simple sentences regarding their basic needs and wants. Expressing basic needs & wants Expressing basic needs & wants Steps to Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesShames, G. H., & Anderson, N. B. (Eds.) (2002). Human communication disorders: An introduction (6th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Reading signsGoalTo be able to read one word written and picture signs found across a variety of contexts. RationaleSigns containing both writing and symbols are used in all environments (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2005). They are used to assist in person safety and inform and instruct everyday processes (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2005). An individual with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) therefore needs to be able comprehend all written signs and symbols that are common in their everyday living environments. Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityPresent the client with a series of signs. The types of signs would range from single picture/symbol signs to written signs and should be taken from a range of contexts relevant to the client’s lifestyle. The number of signs correctly identified out of ten, are then measured as the baseline. Assessment of the baseline signs is then to occur on a weekly basis to measure the client’s progress. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Measurability for step 1 is successful completion of the activity, as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure that the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. The client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy for all other steps after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion, as described above. Steps in Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesBeukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co. Taking medicationsGoalTo be able to follow written/pictorial instructions when taking medications. RationaleUpon returning to home from hospital many clients are taking one or more medications to control their present or previous medical conditions (National Stroke Foundation, 2007). For the client with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) the task of safely managing their medications can become difficult due to their language and cognitive deficits (Worrall, 2000). It is essential that the client be able to read and interpret certain materials e.g. time symbols and numbers. Therefore this goal is crucial as the client’s safety can be compromised by incorrect consumption of medications. Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityThis goal could continue on from the “reading signs” goal. Measurability for steps 1 to 4 is successful completion of the activity, as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure that the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this where applicable. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal will be considered when the client can demonstrate to the clinician the correct tablet/time of medication consumption. This measure will therefore require input from other health professionals (e.g. Doctors, Pharmacists, Nurses and Occupational Therapists) and the client’s caregiver/s. Steps to Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesNational Stroke Foundation. (2007). Medications after a stroke. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,0/task,doc_view/gid,15/ Worrall, L. (2000). FCTP: Functional communication therapy planner. Bicester: Winslow. Using greetings & partingsGoalTo be able to use greetings/partings with a variety of communication partners in a variety of contexts. RationaleFor client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) greetings and partings remain an important means of connecting with others. Although individual’s with ANCD’s are often, like anyone, apprehensive about initiating conversations, they are more likely to attempt such interactions if they have access to greeting phrases similar to those used pre-morbidly (Chapey, 2001). Baseline skills
MeasurabilityMeasurability for steps 1 to 4 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. Successful completion of all other steps can be measured by the client independently using greetings/partings with 90% accuracy. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. The measurability of this step may depend on the client. It may not be realistic for the client to use greetings/partings independently, therefore the measurability may include “with minimal prompting” etc. Results may be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Steps to Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesChapey, R. (Ed). (2001). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. Receiving a telephone callGoalTo be able to receive a telephone call. RationaleFor client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD), the continuation of hobbies and pre-morbid activities is an important means of reducing social isolation (Rochette, Bravo, Desrosiers, St. Cyr-Tribble & Bourget, 2007). For a client to be able to answer the telephone and effectively have a short conversation with a familiar communication partner is a highly important goal in relation to decreasing social isolation and continuing some form of communication with the client’s pre-morbid social network. Baseline Skills Moderate cognitive ability MeasurabilityThis goal could continue on from the “usings greetings and partings” goal. Measurability for steps 1 and 2 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of the goal would be considered once the client can successfully participate in receiving a telephone call. An outcome measurement scale, like the Australian Therapy Outcome Measurement Scale: Speech Pathology (AusTOMS) could also be used to uncover improved independence and socialisation that has been achieved via this goal (Perry & Skeat, 2004). Steps to Achieving Goal
ConsiderationsIt is worthy to note that this goal is the initial step of receiving a telephone call. Further therapy may target taking a message for a received a telephone call. Refer to and liaise with an audiologist if the client has hearing difficulties that are impeding on their ability to fulfil this goal. Telstra also offer services to assist with hearing difficulties (Telstra, n.d.). If the client is unable to complete the task without prompting create a written or pictographic reminder of the necessary information required in exchange for them to keep next to their telephone. ReferencesPerry, A., & Skeat, J. (2004). AusTOMS for Speech Pathology: Australian Therapy Outcome Measures. Melbourne: La Trobe University. Rochette, A., Bravo, G., Desrosiers, J., St. Cyr-Tribble, D., & Bourget, A. (2007). Adaptation process, participation and depression over six months in first-stroke individuals and spouses. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 554-562. Making a telephone callGoalTo be able to make a telephone call to a familiar communication partner. RationaleIt has been purported that community reintegration involves social relationships with others, independence and activities to fill one’s time (McColl, Carlson, Johnston, Minnes, Shue, Davies, & Karlovits, 1998). The ability to not only receive, but also make a telephone call can facilitate each of these aspects of community reintegration. With a familiar communication partner the telephone can enable an individual to reduce social isolation by maintaining family and friendship networks. Baseline Skills High cognitive ability MeasurabilityThis goal could continue on from the “receiving a telephone call” goal. Measurability for step 1 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. Successful completion of all other steps can be measured as the client making 5 successful phone calls independently per task. The client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy for all other steps after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. Results may be graphed and used as a motivating tool for the client. Steps to Achieving Goal1. Discussion with client regarding their reasons for using the telephone Activity: Client and clinician to discuss the client’s reason for using the telephone at home. For example, will it be to call grandchildren overseas once a month or a daughter who lives down the road every day? 2. Practise a face-to-face interaction Activity: Using the client’s primary mode of expression, the client and clinician can practise a basic face-to-face interaction that simulates a social conversation. If the client does not have appropriate turn taking skills they will need to be established during this point in the hierarchy (refer to “using greetings and partings” goal). 3. Reading/understanding numerals 0-9 Activity: Begin with tasks such as putting the numbers in order and discuss their shapes. Quiz the client on the numbers; have them name the presented number. Have client find particular numbers mixed with letters/numbers. Activity: Then practice using a telephone. For example the clinician could say a number and the client has to find the number on the telephone. Verbalise or give a written number sequence for the client to dial in. Increase length of the number sequence. 4. Practise a telephone call on two telephones in the same room Activity: Clinician and client to simulate a social telephone call in a clinic room using two telephones. It is preferable for the client to use the telephone that he/she will be using at home. The clinician can provide verbal and visual prompting to complete this task. 5. Introduce a physical barrier Activity: Clinician and client to simulate a social telephone call in a clinic room, as in the task above. However, introducing a barrier will remove visual cues and assist the client in developing skills such as asking for repetition and clarification. 81 The Road Home: Integrating Functional Communication Therapy into Rehabilitation 6. Practise a telephone call in different rooms Activity: This task is as above, however the client and clinician will be in different rooms furthering the physical barrier. To facilitate this task the clinician can be in the room with the client while another communication partner (e.g. another Speech Pathologist, allied health assistant or significant other) is in another clinic room receiving the telephone call. This enables the clinician to provide online support and feedback to the client. 7. Practise an external telephone call to a familiar communication partner Activity: The client will make a telephone call to a familiar communication partner. Initially the communication partner will be fully briefed and the clinician will provide maximal prompting and assistance. This will gradually be reduced until the client can perform this task independently. ConsiderationsIf the client is unable to communicate expressively through verbal output, but has intact typing ability they can utilise the National Relay Service ‘type and listen’ tool. This encompasses the client typing their message to the relay officer, the relay officer reading the message to the person receiving the call, then the receiver speaking directly to the client (Social Change Online, 2008). Any fine motor control impairment/s should be considered as they may impact on the ability for the client to successfully complete this goal. If necessary liaise with a Physiotherapist and/or and Occupational Therapist. If the client has difficulty initiating conversation a variety of supports can be used to build this skill, such as: Scripting: providing the client with a script for the telephone call. For example if the client wanted to enquire about a shops opening hours the clinician and client could develop and practise a script for the conversation. Using structured and familiar topics. For example in social conversations the communication partners could be instructed to develop the conversation surrounding structured familiar topics to the client e.g. family, friends, hobbies etc… Limit time of calls. The phone calls could begin as short phone calls designed for a brief greeting with a familiar communication partner, for example 30 seconds. Then gradually extend the time of the call. ReferencesMcColl, M., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., Davies, D., & Karlovits, T. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12(1), 15 — 30. Social Change Online. (2008). National relay service: Call options: Type and listen. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.relayservice.com.au/topics/2061.html Ordering a taxiGoalTo be able to order a taxi. RationaleHaving means of transport is crucial to one’s independence (Turner, Fleming, Cornwell, Worrall, Ownsworth, Haines, Kendall & Chenoweth, 2007). Most individual’s who have an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) are required to forfeit their licence due to the level of risk associated with their brain impairment (Austroads, 2006). Therefore the options for independent transport become limited, especially for those who live where there is no or minimal access to public transport. This means that the individual with the ANCD has to become competent and confident to order a taxi, as they desire, to ensure that they can reintegrate and participate in society (McCabe, Lippert, Weiser, Hilditch, Hartridge, & Villamere, 2007). Baseline Skills Moderate cognitive ability MeasurabilityThis goal could continue on from goals such as “making a telephone call” and “using greetings and partings”. Measurability for steps 1 and 2 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal would be considered once the client can order a taxi to attend the social outing they desire. A quality of life scale could also be used to uncover improved independence and socialisation that has been achieved via this goal. Living with Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurement (A-FROM) (Kagan, Simmons-Mackie, Rowland, Huijbretgts, Shumway, McEwen, Threats & Sharp, 2008) is an example of a possible measurement tool. Steps to Achieving Goal
Considerations
ReferencesAustroads. (2006). Assessing fitness to drive. Sydney: Author. Kagan, A., Simmons-Mackie, N., Rowland, A., Huijbretgts, M., Shumway, E., McEwen, S., Threats, T., & Sharp, S. (2008). Counting what counts: A framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 22 (3), 258-80. McCabe, P., Lippert, C., Weiser, M., Hilditch, M., Hartridge, C., & Villamere, J. (2007). Community reintegration following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 21(2), 231-257. Telstra (n.d). Disability services. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.telstra.com.au/disability/catalogue/additional.html Turner, B., Fleming, J., Cornwell, P., Worrall, L., Ownsworth, T., Haines, T., Kendall, M., & Chenoweth, L. (2007). A qualitative study of the transition from hospital to home for individuals with acquired brain injury and their family caregivers. Brain Injury, 21(11), 1119-1130. Communicating travel destinationsGoalTo be able to accurately communicate a travel destination to a taxi driver. RationaleIndividual’s with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) often experience many other disabilities post their neurological incident (e.g. physical disability and cognitive deficits) that affect general reaction time. As a result, many individual’s who have an ANCD are required to forfeit their licence due to the level of risk associated with their impairment (Austroads, 2006). Therefore, individuals are required to utilise an alternate transportation option. Achievement of this goal will assist the individual to increase community participation and decrease social isolation. Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityOnce the goal of “ordering a taxi” has been achieved, a further goal of communicating the travel destination to the taxi driver should be targeted. Measurability for step 1 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. For the baseline measure the client will be required to convey a correct address/travel destination to an unfamiliar communication partner on 10 occasions. The number of responses correct out of the 10 attempts during the task can then be used as a baseline measure for the client. The client will be required to complete baseline task with a new communication partner on a weekly basis to measure their progress. Results from the weekly task could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Steps to Achieving Goal1. Client to comprehend what an address is and their address Activity: The task will include a picture aid describing what an address is and its association to a house. Presentation of a flash card with the client’s address written on it will be shown to them. 2. Client to express known address to clinician with maximal prompting Activity: Implement drill tasks to develop the client’s comprehension of their address. Then progress with drill tasks involving the clinician asking “what is your address?”. Maximal prompting may include providing them with a lead in sentence for giving their address, prompting with the flash card that contains their address or verbal prompts. 3. Client to express known address to clinician with minimal prompting Activity: Role-play the scenario of getting into a taxi. The clinician is to request the client’s address and prompt the client to express their address. 4. Client to express known address to clinician independently Activity: Role-play the scenario of getting into a taxi. The clinician is to have their back turned to the client (who is sitting in the back seat of the taxi) and request the client to express their address. 5. Client to express known address to a familiar communication partner Activity: Request a family member or friend to attend the session to participate in this activity. Implement a drill activity that requires the familiar communication partner to request the client to express their address. 6. Client to express known address to unfamiliar communication partner Activity: Invite another Speech Pathologist/colleague unfamiliar to the client to attend the session and participate in the activity. Implement a drill activity requiring the unfamiliar communication partner to request the client to express their address. Communicating travel destinations 7. Client to express their address to a taxi driver with clinician present Activity: Clinician should adequately brief the client of the task and their expectations of the client. The task involves the client to independently order a taxi and greet the taxi driver on arrival (refer to other relevant communication acts). The client is then required to express the address to the taxi driver, with the clinician providing prompting where required. 8. Client to express their address to a taxi driver with a familiar communication partner present Activity: The task involves the client to independently order a taxi and greet the taxi driver on arrival (refer to other relevant communication acts). The client is then required to express the address to the taxi driver, with the familiar communication partner providing prompting where required. 9. Client to express their address to a taxi driver with an unfamiliar communication partner present Activity: The task involves the client to independently order the taxi and greet the taxi driver on arrival (refer to other relevant communication acts). The client is then required to express the address to the taxi driver, with the unfamiliar communication partner providing prompting where required. 10. Client to express their address to a taxi driver independently Activity: The client should contact the clinician following completion of the task for a debrief. 11. Other destinations Once the client has developed the ability to express their own address, destination addresses can be targeted using a similar hierarchy as above. Prioritise the destinations by targeting the 5 most common destinations the client visits (e.g. doctors, recreational facilities, significant other’s homes, etc…). Communicating travel destinations ConsiderationsIf the client is non-verbal, then integrate the use of AAC. If the client presents with memory deficits, then introduce the permanent use of flash cards to assist the client when expressing their address. Consider the client’s mobility. Is the client able to independently or with minimal assistance walk from their house to the taxi and get in? If the answer is no, then liaise with a Physiotherapist and/or Occupational Therapist to assist in achieving adequate mobility. Refer to ‘Talking Taxis’ program, developed by the Maribyrnong City Council to assist in communication between taxi drivers and passengers. The program features specific communication tools such as picture boards and personal journey cards, etc… These tools have been found to benefit passengers, particularly those with a disability (Legge, 2008). ReferencesAustroads. (2006). Assessing fitness to drive. Sydney: Author. Legge, J. (2008). Passengers will have easier journeys after ‘Talking Taxis’ launch. Retrieved October 7, 2008, from http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/Page/page.asp?Page_Id=3770&h=0. Participating in religious actsGoalTo be able to participate in a religious act through the use of automated speech. RationaleFor client’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders (ANCD) the continuation of hobbies and pre-morbid activities is an important means of reducing social isolation (Rochette, Bravo, Desrosiers, St. Cyr-Tribble & Bourget, 2007). Religious activities and worship are important for the psychological well-being of many older adults. Therefore, this goal is an important consideration for functional therapy (Chapey, 2001). Because many prayers and religious mantras have an automatic speech component, targeting this aspect allows those clients with less spontaneous speech to still be able to participate in their religious practices. Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityMeasurability for steps 1 and 2 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal would be considered once the client can recite the chosen prayer or religious mantra in the context of a religious service. A quality of life scale could also be used to uncover improved independence, spiritual satisfaction and socialisation that have been achieved via this goal. An outcome measurement scale, like the Australian Therapy Outcome Measurement Scale: Speech Pathology (AusTOMS) could also be used to uncover improved independence and socialisation that has been achieved via this goal (Perry & Skeat, 2004). Steps to Achieving Goal1. Discussion regarding client’s pre-morbid religion and religious practices 2. Clinician to research religion and religious acts 3. Client to practise reciting the prayer(s)/mantra(s) with clinician 4. Client to recite the prayer(s)/mantra(s) with familiar communication partner/s 5. Client to recite the prayer(s)/mantra(s) with unfamiliar communication partner/s ConsiderationsMay need to consider dexterity if the specified religion utilise a religious prop whilst reciting the prayer(s)/mantra(s) (e.g. Hail Mary can be recited using Rosary Beads in the Catholic religion) Therefore, liaise with an Occupational Therapist. ReferencesChapey, R. (Ed). (2001). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th Ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. Perry, A., & Skeat, J. (2004). AusTOMS for Speech Pathology: Australian Therapy Outcome Measures. Melbourne: La Trobe University. Rochette, A., Bravo, G., Desrosiers, J., St. Cyr-Tribble, D., & Bourget, A. (2007). Adaptation process, participation and depression over six months in first-stroke individuals and spouses. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 554-562. Participating in a communicative transactionGoalTo be able to participate in a simple communicative transaction i.e. purchase a coffee, with an unfamiliar communication partner. RationaleExtensive literature research has shown that an individual with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) is at risk for social isolation, depression and anxiety (Stalnacke, 2007). Therefore, the aim of this goal is to assist with increasing the client’s participation in life events, optimising their independence and improving their self-esteem in order to improve quality of life (Wallace, Evans, Arnold & Hux, 2007; Cruice, 2008). If the client is able to purchase an item, whether through verbal or non-verbal means, it will assist with their social functioning and overall ability to function independently. Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityThis goal could continue on from the “using greetings and partings” goal. Measurability for step 1 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal will be considered when the client can demonstrate to the clinician successful participation in a simple communicative transaction with an unfamiliar communication partner. Steps to Achieving Goal
ConsiderationsIf the client is unable to verbally communicate, appropriate alternative methods will be implemented i.e. AAC devices, gesture, menus etc… ReferencesStalnacke, B-M. (2007). Community integration, social support and life satisfaction in relation to symptoms 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 21(9), 933-942. Wallace, S.E., Evans, K., Arnold, T., & Hux, K. (2007). Functional brain injury rehabilitation: Survivor experiences reported by families and professionals. Brain injury, 21(13), 1371-1384. Worrall, L. (2000). FCTP: Functional communication therapy planner. Bicester: Winslow. Text MessagingGoalTo be able to write a text message on a mobile phone to a familiar communication partner. RationaleAccording to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, traumatic brain injury rates are amongst the highest for youths to young adults (Helps, Henley & Harrison, 2008). In 2007, The Australian Bureau of Statistics reported that the second most common method used for communicating with friends and family was the use of the mobile phone Short Message Service (SMS). Mobile phone use was also found to be extremely predominant amongst younger age groups (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007). Considering the evidence suggests that a large number of individual’s with an acquired neurological communicative disorder (ANCD) are young and that mobile phone texting is most commonly used by youth, this goal is an important inclusion. This is because SMS is a means of communicating with significant others and relationships are important to a person’s well-being. The ability to write a text message on a mobile phone will assist those with an ANCD to maintain important links with those they are close to (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007). Baseline Skills
MeasurabilityMeasurability for step 1 is successful completion of the activity as judged by the clinician. The clinician should ensure the client understands the task. Basic yes/no comprehension questions can be used to measure this. For all remaining steps, the client will progress to the next level of the hierarchy after achieving 90% or more success on the preceding step. A baseline of ten attempts can be used to measure criterion. These achievements could be graphed and then used as a motivating tool for the client. Achievement of this goal will be considered when the client can demonstrate to the clinician successful ability to write a text message on a mobile phone to a familiar communication partner. Steps to Achieving Goal
ConsiderationsThis goal is not recommended for clients who are 65 years+ and/or those who did not use texting as a regular means of communicating pre-morbidly. ReferencesAustralian Bureau of Statistics (2007). General social survey: Summary results. Australia, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Helps, Y., Henley, G., & Harrison, J.E. (2008). Hospital separations due to traumatic brain injury, Australia 2004–05. Injury research and statistics series number 45. Australia, Adelaide: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. AppendixUseful resources for clinicians and clients working with acquired neurological communicative disorders. TextsChapey, R. (Ed). (2001). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th Ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. Elman, R. (2007). Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach. San Diego: Plural Publishing. Parr, S. (2004). The stroke and aphasia handbook. London: Connect Press. Perry, A., & Skeat, J. (2004). AusTOMS for Speech Pathology: Australian Therapy Outcome Measures. Melbourne: La Trobe University. Sloan, S., Mackey, J., & Chamberlain, S. (2006). Communicate with confidence. Australia: Skilled Life Press. Journal ArticlesDoig, E., Fleming, J., & Tooth, L. (2001). Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 15(9), 747 — 762. Hersh, D. (2007). How do people with aphasia view their discharge from therapy? Aphasiology, 1 – 20. Holliday, R. C., Ballinger, C., & Playford, E. D. (2007). Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: Patients’ perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(5), 389 – 394. Howe, T.J., Worrall, L.E., & Hickson, L.M.H. (2007). Interviews with people with aphasia: Environmental factors that influence their community participation. Aphasiology, 1-29. McCabe, P., Lippert, C., Weiser, M., Hilditch, M., Hartridge, C., & Villamere, J. (2007). Community reintegration following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 21(2), 231-257. McColl, M., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., Davies, D., & Karlovits, T. (1998). The definition of community integration: perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12(1), 15 — 30. Rayner, H., & Marshall, J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(2), 149-64. Siegert, R., & Taylor, W. (2004). Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1 – 8. Simmons-Mackie, N., Kearns, K., & Potechin, G. (2005). Treatment of aphasia through family member training. Aphasiology, 19(6), 583-93. Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (1999). Communication strategies used by `good’ versus `poor’ speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13(9-11) 807-20. Turner, B., Fleming, J., Cornwell, P., Worrall, L., Ownsworth, T., Haines, T., Kendall, M., & Chenoweth, L. (2007). A qualitative study of the transition from hospital to home for individuals with acquired brain injury and their family caregivers. Brain Injury, 21(11), 1119-1130. WebsitesBrain Injury Association of America. (2008). Welcome to the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA’s) new website. http://www.biausa.org/ Legge, J. (2008). Passengers will have easier journeys after ‘Talking Taxis’ launch. http://www.maribyrnong.vic.gov.au/Page/page.asp?Page_Id=3770&h=0. National Aphasia Association. (2008). Welcome to the National Aphasia Association. http://www.aphasia.org/ National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2008). National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDOC). http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/ Speech pathology Australia. (2008). Speech pathology Australia. http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/ Telstra. (2008). Additional products - Disability services – Telstra. http://www.telstra.com.au/disability/catalogue/additional.html The Pharmacy Guild of Australia. (2008). The pharmacy guild of Australia. http://www.guild.org.au/ Aphasia friendly websites Communication Disability in Ageing Research Unit (CDARU). (2001). Queensland University Aphasia Groups. www.shrs.uq.edu.au/cdaru/aphasiagroups Connect Communication Disability Network. (2008). UK Connect – Home. www.ukconnect.org Parr, S., Newbery, J., Moss, B., & Long, B. (2002). Aphasiahelp.org – for people with aphasia. www.aphasiahelp.org Talkback Association for Aphasia Inc. (2008). Talkback Association for Aphasia Inc., Supporting people with aphasia. http://aphasia.asn.au/aphasiafriendly/index.htm The Stroke Association. (2008). The Stroke Association – Welcome to the Stroke Association. http://www.stroke.org.uk/index.html Functional Assessment Tools Frattali, C.M., Thompson, C.K., Holland, A.L., Wohl, C.B., & Ferketic, M.M. (1995). American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults. Rockville, MD: ASHA. Holland, A.L., Frattali, C.M., & Fromm, D. (1999). Communication Activities of Daily Living (2nd Ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The Communicative Effectiveness Index: Development and psychometric evaluation of functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113-124. Porch, B.E. (1981). Porch Index of Communicative Ability. (Vol.2) Administration, Scoring and Interpretation (3rd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Sarno, M.T. (1969). The functional communication profile: manual of directions. New York: New York University Medical Center, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. Worrall, L. (2000). FCTP: Functional communication therapy planner. Bicester: Winslow. This resource will be useful for student Speech Pathologists, Speech Pathology graduates and those re-entering the field of rehabilitation for individual’s with acquired neurological communicative disorders. The therapy resource manual specifically focuses on language, addressing the transition from hospital to home. This manual aims to provide functional ideas for targeting the essential communication acts required for the client returning home. This package was created by Jacqueline Bonney, Lucy Bransgrove, Shelley Coy, Lauren Cutler, Hayley Dell’Oro and Mikayla Moroney (4th Year student Speech Pathologists, at La Trobe University) under the supervision of Donna McNeill-Brown, Bronwyn Cox and Anna Volkmer.
Content Approved by: Head of School
Page maintained by: Office Administrator Last Updated: 19 December, 2008 |