Statutory business judgment rule

The following post is by student contributor, Leigh Howard.

The statutory business judgment rule was implanted into the Corporations Act in 1999 by the instigation of the ‘CLERP’ reform, and has been the subject of both controversy and accolade ever since.  It’s present-day form derives from the United States, where it was developed as a common law doctrine and had considerable influence, particularly in the State of Delaware (for a history of the rule, see Redmond, “Safe Harbours or Sleepy Hollows: Does Australia Need a Statutory Business Judgment Rule?” in Ramsay (ed.) Corporate Governance and the Duties of Company Directors, 1997 p. 185). The Australian manifestation sits alongside the duty to discharge powers with the care and diligence of a reasonable person under s 180. It operates as a defence to any business judgment that that is made in good faith and for a proper purpose, so long as the director has no material personal interest and a belief the judgement is in the best interests of the corporation (see s 180(2) of the Act). Adversaries to the rule fear that the rule could operate as a safe harbour for negligent directors otherwise deserving of scrutiny under the duty of care and diligence. However, law makers on both sides of the Parliament believe that the rule in its present form does not go far enough.

I.        Government proposal to extend the business judgment rule

In a Treasury report dated April 2006 (‘Corporate and Financial Services: Regulation Review, Department of Treasury, April 2006), The Howard government put forward a proposal to extend the business judgment rule beyond its present scope. Instead of limiting the defence to that duty, the Howard Government proposal extends broader protection for directors under the rule, excusing them from liability under the Corporations Act so long as directors act:

o        In a bona fide manner;

o        Within the scope of the corporations business;

o        Reasonably and incidentally to the corporations business; and

o        For the corporation's benefit.

Despite the change of government, this proposal seemingly is still on foot. As early as May 19, 2008 Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner and Small Business Minister Craig Emerson flagged such reforms when advising the Coalition of Australian Governments Meeting that the Government wanted to reduce and streamline the obligations imposed on company directors, including those obligations under the Corporations Act (Lenore Taylore, ‘Directors Win Relaxed Personal Liability’, Australian Financial Review, May 19 2008).

II.      The rationale of reform

The rationale for reform is made simple upon considering that the Corporations Act itself rivals the Income Tax Assessment Act 1996 as the most dense and detailed Acts of the legislature of Australia (Robson, Annotated Corporations Law, 2000, p. iii). Quite simply, it is feared that the extensive and sometimes unintelligible duties contained in the Act and general law are preventing risk-taking, hampering enterprise and are in effect anti business (Michael Kirby, “Corporate Governance, Corporate Law and Global Forces”, p.54). Small Business Minister Craig Emerson put it quite cogently:

“We want to pull [the Act] back to where it seems sensible, so that company directors can spend more time making good business decisions and less time trying to understand highly complex legal obligations” (quoted in Lenore Taylor, ‘Directors Win Relaxed Personal Liability’, Australian Financial Review, May 19 2008)

Parliament is not the alone in thinking that overregulation could be chilling entrepreneurialism. In the most famous AWA Case (Daniels v Anderson), the majority of the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal stressed:

“The courts have recognised that directors must be allowed to make business judgments and business decisions in the spirit of enterprise untrammelled by the concerns of [conservatism]; any entrepreneur will rely upon a variety of talents in deciding whether to invest in the business venture … Great risks will be taken in the hope of commensurate rewards. If such ventures fail, how is the undertaking of it to be judged against an allegation of negligence by the entrepreneur?”’ (1995) 13 ACLC at pages 662-663.

If the business judgment rule was to stand alone and promote more general expectations of officers and certainty of decision making, it could be used as the vehicle to simplify core duties and to better educate officers and boards alike. In light of a recent survey conducted by the Chartered Secretaries of Australia, which found that more than half of their members “believed that excessive penalties were discouraging suitably qualified people from accepting board positions” (Chartered Securities Australia, “CSA Rapid Response Survey No. 23”, Sept 2008), it can be said with surety that some sort of leveller is needed. The question is, exactly, how should the Government go about it without dismantling the already intricate balance in place.

III.    Is the proposed amendment the best way to reduce and streamline obligations?

The extended business judgment rule must include appropriate measures that not only removes the fear of “presentation imperatives (of data, evidence and process)” but promotes informed, rigorous decision making (Clarke, ‘This Business Judgment Rule – Good Corporate Governance or not?, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 2000). The question is therefore posed: what is it about the new proposal that goes to successfully achieve this aim?

Mark Bryne (‘Directors to hide from a sea of liabilities in a new safe harbour’, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 2008) is one jurist that has taken the lead as one of the first to provide an analysis of the 2006 Treasury recommendations. His contention is that its proposed form is weak and is likely to create a number of new unforseen risks. Central to his critique is the shortcomings of the ‘bona fide’ requirement within the Howard proposal, which he construes under the general law definition in relation to the duty to act in the interests of a company (ibid., 261; relying on Chew v R (1991) 5 ACSR 473, 499). He notes that defining ‘bona fide’ requires an assessment of honesty, which is a subjective criterion  and against the objective notions of the duties that aim not to second guess the decisions of officers and directors (ibid, 261-262). He believes that Courts will have crippling difficulty with this and will lead to uncertain application. With respect, and even if bona fide is at present an uncertain criterion, this may not be a sufficient ground for total dismissal of the proposal. Bona fide will be interpreted with implicit regard to the intentions of the legislature, which we are yet to see. Nonetheless, Bryne’s analysis does reaffirm the need for thoroughness when setting the scope for what will be a very controversial safe harbour.

What is most compelling, however, is Bryne’s discussion regarding whether the rule should apply to the duty to prevent insolvent trading. This is the most controversial proposed extension, but again has been rationalised by proponents as a necessary protection that ensures directors be given every opportunity to take “necessary risks that are commensurate with the existence of a entrepreneurial spirit” (Robert Baxt, ‘The Business Judgment Rule: Have we reached a safe and sensible landing?’, (2006) 2(2) Baxt Report 3 at 3). Directors facing insolvency have even more reason to take risk, and must have the benefit of additional protection in order to encourage “trading out of trouble” (ibid, 12). However, and as Bryne correctly points out, risk when nearing insolvency is a very different consideration to risk when trading in good condition:

“Any potential venture, even the very risky, that may turn a profit could be all that lies between them and the failure of the company. Given that their own benefits and utility is so closely linked to the company, the element of risk may almost become irrelevant…What is the likelihood of the directors finding another such position when the company fails?” (‘Directors to hide from a sea of liabilities in a new safe harbour’, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 2008, 265)

As directors own stake in the company changes, so does risk. Therefore, it is inappropriate for to apply the same defence to different contexts and “to suggest a general safe harbour could be and should be applied in the same way” (ibid).

Bryne has not proposed an alternative to the Treasury formulation, preferring to argue that existing protection under the common law is sufficient protection. Unfortunately, Bryne will be ignored. The pressure to simplify core duties, which has resulted in bipartisan support, surely allows one to conclude that the extension is a reality, albeit periodically shelved by the Rudd government.

IV.    Beyond the Treasury proposal

To suggest where discussion should be directed beyond the Treasury proposal requires one to first identify the concerns that all stakeholders have raised. Bryne goes some way in evidencing these concerns. Distilling all scholastic material to this debate results in three key considerations that ought to be carefully considered:

1.       The intention to better facilitate risk taking as a necessary element to entrepreneurialism;

2.       The reluctance of Courts to ‘second-guess’ business judgments in retrospect, or to “exercise a supervisory function over the business judgments of directors” (Idamenco (No 123) Pty Ltd v Symbion Health Ltd (2007) 165 FCR 19)

3.       The desire to promote ‘self-regulation’ instead of ‘deregulation’ (see Angus Corbet, ‘Self Regulation, CLERP and Financial Markets: A Missed Opportunity for Innovative Regulatory Reform’, UNSWLJ, Vol 5,  1999); and

4.       In regards to the form it will take, the need for simplicity and cogency in streamlining obligations.

Measuring these concerns against the Treasury proposal makes the Treasury proposal seem naive and almost innocent. It is submitted that current debate is stifled with semantic arguments, which has obviously influenced the Treasury proposal and has served little use. Why not legislate for a statutory business judgment rule that expressly addresses the above mentioned concerns? Such a rule could include a test of appropriate risk, and could identify several ‘levels’ of risk that could help Courts in construing what was required by the director in question. This could eliminate the concerns Bryne raises in regards to the duty to prevent insolvent trading. Such a proposal could expressly limit the Courts power to apply their powers retrospectively, while outlining a way to approach the defence that preserves the requisite ‘teeth’. Further, it could outline a non-exhaustive number of considerations that could assist Courts in construing evidence and limit deregulation, which could in turn be used to help companies self regulate. If this is at the expense of simplicity – then so be it – at least the rule will be hardened by statute and continue with the trend of departing from the common law when it comes to corporate governance.

V.      Conclusion

Nonetheless, despite initial positive indications we are still yet to see whether the Rudd government will tackle these proposed reforms, or in fact any other reforms that were on the table when the Howard government was in power (see R Nickless, ‘Corporate Law Reform at Standstill’, Australian Financial Review, 25 March 2008, p. 6). This analysis is therefore premature, but we are likely to see much attention in this area in light of ASIC’s prosecution of Australia’s richest man, Andrew Forrest. Forrest is being litigated after announcing falsified deals with Chinese mining companies to the ASX, allegedly for the purpose of attracting creditors to invest in his expanding business (see R Le May, ‘FMG’s CREC deal would’ve influenced investors: ASIC tells court’, Australian Financial Review, 6 May 2009, p.3). Counsel’s defence of Forrest relied wholly on the business judgment rule. While we won’t see the judgment for some time, it is likely to thrust the reform debate back on the public agenda and result in much more scholastic innovation – and hopefully action by government.


    No Trackbacks


Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. Data entry services says:

    Indeed, understanding corporate law is one and implementing it is another story, litigation support services do help in such situations.

  2. designer Clothing says:

    My friends told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read. thank you for your sharing wholesale Clothing

  3. Jack Smith says:

    I think there is a lot of things that are not practiced in the present world in business.

  4. Data Entry India says:

    Awareness about various business rules whether onshore or offshore is must to avoid any conflicts and smooth functioning of business.

  5. Graphic designing company says:

    I really appreciate the insights I have received from this blog, it gets you to think on certain issues. I just read an article written on the same issue and I agree that the BJR only diminishes the standard of care required of corporate officers.

  6. Outsourcing Services says:

    Very interesting article, makes you think. Its great though that the government was trying to implement the necessary regulations.

  7. Audio transcription services says:

    Being familiar with the obligations and objective of business is must and this post provided the same information.

  8. Johny Smith says:

    Save cost and man-power by having our team of data entry specialists handle all your data entry needs.
    Simply forward your listings via fax or email to our team. We work around the clock to see to it that
    your database is updated in a timely manner.

  9. New Jersey Attorney says:

    I have read it . Really that's great and enjoyed it. Hope every body enjoyed as like me and it's very help full for us.

  10. car accident claim lawyers says:

    Here i reached first time but it's enjoyed very much. Hope that every body likes that.

  11. John Berry says:

    Nice post buddy... agreed with all the points

  12. Data Entry says:

    I’m impressed, I need to say. Really hardly ever do I encounter a weblog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you will have hit the nail on the head. I'm very joyful that I stumbled across this in my seek for one thing referring to this.I also like Government proposal.

  13. mulberry bag says:

    The hand bags come in various colors and we need to choose colors according to our outfit as well as situations and seasons. Black and white are the classic and hot colors in handbags.

  14. Meeting Rooms Sydney says:

    thank you for sharing, very interesting article , i really enjoyed reading it! totally agree with john berry!

  15. Interview transcription services says:

    Informative post for small and medium size business owners. Well help a lot in their next endeavors.

  16. pressure cleaning brisbane says:

    Thanks for posting this info. I just want to let you know that I just check out your site and I find it very interesting and informative.

  17. Ивентьев Сергей Иванович says:

    В России в конце XX-начале XXI вв. были открыты четвёртое и пятое поколения прав человека, о чём имеются соответствующие научные публикации (Ивентьев С.И. Четвёртое и пятое поколение прав человека//Гуманитарные науки: сборник научных трудов. Часть II. – Караганда: Издательство КарГУ. 2010. с.47-49; Ивентьев С.И. Классификация прав человека и гражданина//Казанская наука. - Казань: Изд-во Казанский Издательский Дом. N 3. 2010. с.199-203. ), а также принята Декларация Божественных и духовно-нравственных прав и свобод человека от 23.11.2010г. (Ивентьев С.И. Декларация Божественных и духовно-нравственных прав и свобод человека как источник права//Збiрка наукових праць. Часть 1. –Киев: НАИРН, 2010. с.60-65;

  18. Forever Lazy says:

    This was a great post, good issues brought up. I agree with the post that cost effectiveness, time management are key to a successful vineyard.

  19. drugs advice says:

    am also interested in this topic. I have spent a lot of time on searching this kind of topic. It is very informative.

  20. buy codeine online says:

    A healthy diet is not about strict nutrition philosophies, staying extremely thin, or depriving yourself of foods you love. Rather it is to get that good to have more energy and you keep healthy as possible.

  21. buy percocet online says:

    Thanks for the informative writing. Would mind updating some good tips about it. I still wait your next place. ;-)

  22. buy hydrocodone online says:

    Very significant article for us ,I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site

  23. curcumin says:

    Curcumin has the capacity of interact with multiple molecular targets affecting the many processes in cancer formation.

  24. tubal reversal surgery says:

    It was very useful for me. Keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. This was actually what I was looking for, and I am glad to come here! Thanks for sharing the such information with us.
    tubal reversal surgery
    reversal of tubal ligation

  25. tubal reversal says:

    Anyway thanks a lot one more time for the great and informative publication.

  26. buy ritalin online says:

    wow.. its a great place to buy cheap medicine... Because now a days medicine is need for all home.. so it is very easily way to purchase medicine at home... wonderful article.

  27. Dr. Norman Smith Blog says:

    Thanks for the new school information. I always enjoy reading new articles and school news updates.

  28. Property Auction says:

    New updates, sharing information and site news. Enjoyable to read all the current news and responses.

  29. Organic Supplements says:

    Thanks for a nice share you have given to us with such an large collection of information. Great work you have done by sharing them to all. Simply superb

  30. best seo company for google says:

    You will be missed.The one place where as a venue and fan I could search by what ever perimeters I chose .Good Luck with your future endeavors.

  31. best seo company for google says:

    The idea behind this article is excellent, and for me the first item ("Create your own damn content!") is the real gem here: most of the people spend their entire lives only consuming what is created by others, and creating nothing themselves--or never sharing what they create, which is better than not creating at all, though not the best they could do.

  32. Car Repair says:

    New information-terrific school site, great news and interesting responses. Thanks for all the input and student responses.

  33. Bariatric Surgery says:

    New suggestions and updated content, thanks for all the valuable input and new faculty responses.

  34. Quickbooks Hosting says:

    Interesting comments, news, and opinions, great to read all the student opinions. Thanks for all the news and relevant updates.

  35. Data Recovery Services says:

    New information-terrific site, relevant news and interesting responses. Thanks for all the articles and new school data.

  36. Contractor Accounting says:

    Excellent site, thanks for the articles and all the school news, very helpful and interesting information.

  37. Plumber Sydney says:

    New comments, news, and opinions, great to read all the responses-hopefully more people will contribute new topics.

  38. ignition lock says:

    Really i appreciate the effort you made to share the knowledge. The topic here i found was really effective to the topic which i was researching for a long time

  39. the best seo company says:

    I have no words to appreciate this post ..... I'm really impressed with this post .... the person who created this post was a big thank you man .. for sharing with us.

  40. organic vitamins says:

    Hi! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and new initiatives in the same niche. Blog gave us useful information to work. You have done an amazing job!

  41. UK Dissertations says:

    Good article and great site.Thank’s for sharing..!

  42. Buy An Essay Online says:

    Nice, accurate and to the point.I am going to save the URL and will definitely visit again.

  43. Custom Essays UK says:

    wonderful issues altogether, you simply won a new reader.

  44. generic labs says:

    Thanks for shearing, i really enjoyed reading it!

  45. lancersunny says:

    Nice, accurate and to the point.Thanks for a nice share you have given to us with such an large collection of information. Great work you have done by sharing them to all. Simply superb

  46. Service computer melbourne says:

    Wow, thats amazing.I love the way you write. Do you provide an RSS feed?

  47. Low cost logo design says:

    I am totally agree with your opinion.this blog post is very encouraging to people who want to know these topics.

  48. laptop repair melbourne says:

    Your site is good Actually, i have seen your post and That was very informative and very entertaining for me. Thanks for posting Really Such Things. I should recommend your site to my friends. Cheers.

  49. do my phd research paper says:

    To the extent that the subject matter is concerned you have chosen a truly fine and hot topic

  50. GM Tech2 says:

    Twinb C4+GT1 IBM T30 HDD combines the function of MB Star C4 and BMW GT1 pro, is a professional diagnostic tool for Mercedes Benz and BMW. Containing two hard disks ,and all the newest software for C4 and GT1

  51. laptop screen repair melbourne says:

    Certainly a fantastic piece of work ... It has relevant information. Thanks for posting this. Your blog is so interesting and very informative.Thanks sharing. Definitely a great piece of work Thanks for your work.

  52. coach outlet store online says:

    Awesome post. So nice to discover somebody with a few unique thoughts on this subject matter. I will recommend this post to my friends. Thank you for sharing.

  53. college research paper says:

    Thank you for another great article.

  54. dissertation writing says:

    i am reading the all rules about Statutory business judgment,and i totally agree with the rules,

  55. Logo Design says:

    The information and the aspect were just wonderful.I think that your viewpoint is deep, it’s just well thought out and truly incredible to see someone who knows how to put these thoughts so well.Good job!

  56. online scratchcards says:

    In my opinion the ruleas are rather strict but fair. I liked this article and I am waiting for new updates.

  57. coach factory outlet says:

    Thanks for taking the time to discuss about this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

  58. ach processing says:

    It's very interesting report. I don't understand all, but you affected almost all problems of statutory business

  59. International Cargo Shipping says:

    adoption of reforms is often a very long process. everything should be analyzed, before making important decisions

  60. Minsk apartments for rent says:

    I guess you're very smart person. You know so much about this theme. I want to be so clever as you

  61. coach outlet store online says:

    I have saved this webpage and I truly intend on visiting the site in the upcoming days. Thanks for such a wonderful share!

  62. Data Entry UK says:

    Amazing. I want to say that It is a superb though that the govt was trying to apply the necessary rules.

  63. Cheap Jerseys says:

    You can definitely see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to say how they believe. Always go after your heart.

  64. Dissertation says:

    You can definitely see your enthusiasm in the work you write The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to say how they believe Always go after your heart.

  65. Adwords Management says:

    In my opinion not only Counsel’s defence of Forrest relied wholly on the business judgment rule, but also many other thihg relied too. We should see the judgment although for some time.

  66. James Smith says:

    The information is very nice.

  67. coach outlet store says:

    Your article is wonderful, very interesting, I would like to express my suupport to your idea in your article. I want to learn from you!

  68. Magazine Layout Design Services says:

    I have read your blog i am very impress and very useful information. thanks

  69. Joy Smith says:

    Wonderful, very interesting article.

  70. Outsource Transcription Services says:

    Yes guys its really a good post. Thanks for sharing this post.

  71. Typesetting Services says:

    Nice information and thanks provide amazing detail

  72. BPO Services says:

    I love the way you write. Do you provide an RSS feed?

  73. Financial transcription services says:

    Govt. rules and regulation play a very important role in determining the outsourcing facilities in that particular country.

  74. Scanning Services says:

    Thanks for sharing these nice post.

  75. Web Research Services says:

    Nice post. thanks for sharing

  76. Joy Smith says:

    I am totally agree with your opinion.this blog post is very encouraging to people who want to know these topics.

    Transcription Services India

  77. Bannner Design Services says:

    Article is wonderful, very interesting, I would like to express my support to your idea in your article. thanks

  78. Typing Services says:

    Yes, this really nice post and its help to get some innovative ideas from their.

  79. Newsletter Layout Design says:

    I have reading your post and i agree for your Statutory business judgment rules

  80. DTP Services says:

    You can definitely see your passion in the perform you create.

  81. Book Scanning Services says:

    I think there is a lot of factors that are not used in the existing globe in company.

  82. Document Scanning Services says:

    Hi! This is my first VISIT to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and new projects in the same market.

  83. Audio Typing Services says:

    Indeed this post are really informative and interesting. We are actually impressed by this post.

  84. Copy Typing Services says:

    really this blog post very encouraging to us. by through this we know very much on this topic.

  85. Banner Design Services says:

    Innovative post, thanks for sharing

  86. hockey 2014 says:

    Australia’s richest man - Andrew Forrest - is a good example for everybody. He had some troubles but nevertheless he is brave person who struggles all the time.

  87. hormone therapy for men says:

    Really your publish is actually excellent and that i be thankful. You are writing perfectly that is amazing. I truly astounded by your publish regards.

  88. literature review says:

    Opponent to the ruling panic that the rule could work as a safe harbor for negligent manager otherwise commendable of scrutiny

  89. IS 250c says:

    I like your post. It is good to see you verbalize from the heart and clarity on this important subject can be easily observed.

  90. discount oakley sunglasses says:

    Good article ah, I feel very fortunate, oneself see today the first article is so good, I saw very is like, as if he would go great luck ah, thank the authors share, I will continue to focus on the author's share.

  91. sporting bet says:

    all that is written here does not correspond to reality. The wolrd is changing everyday

  92. Proposal says:

    very detail blog about judgment rules,and i take very useful knowledge,

The author does not allow comments to this entry