A Kyoto Protocol commitment - again?
Thursday, December 1. 2011
The negotiating process on climate change revolves around the sessions of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP), which meets every year to review the implementation of the Convention. The COP adopts decisions and resolutions, published in reports of the COP. Successive decisions taken by the COP make up a detailed set of rules for practical and effective implementation of the Convention. The COP also serves as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP), which also adopts decisions and resolutions on the implementation of its provision.
The critical focus at COP17 is whether there will be achieved a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol. It is widely argued by Developing Nations that the UNFCCC Annex One Nations (essentially the Developed Nations) should commit to a second 5 year commitment period. The current commitment period - during which Annex One Nations committed to achieve certain carbon emission reduction targets - expires in 2012. There are a multiplicity of complications surrounding the extension of the Kyoto Protocol for a 2nd commitment period – which brought about the stand-off at Copenhagen, with its compromise but nevertheless important Accord, and then the non-binding Cancun Agreements in 2010.
In Cancun some of the essential elements of the Copenhagen Accord were informally incorporated in to the UNFCCC. These Cancun Agreements addressed issues involving mitigation targets which were pledged by all major national economies, including China and India. The Cancun agreements also included provisions to strengthen finance and transparency. Few are optimistic that Durban will achieve a binding outcome, despite the advances that did occur in Cancun where some of the largest emitting nations within the Developing World agreed to “enter the fold” – in particular China and India - by confirming that they intended to reach certain targets, but not in accordance with legally binding commitments under, say, a Kyoto Protocol with an expanded scope beyond Annex One nations.
Commentators here in Durban are repeatedly stating that Durban really represents a last chance for agreeing on global action before it is too late. The in-coming President of COP17/CMP7, the South African Minister for International Relations and Co-operation, Ms Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, said in her welcoming remarks: “Durban is the end of the line for the postponement of key political issues and we seek to facilitate a balanced and credible outcome that is equitable, fair and inclusive. The Party-Driven-Principle has been emphasised on numerous occasions and we cannot be expected to drive the process as incoming COP President, and prescribe the outcome of the negotiations. We need the support of all countries and parties. We will maintain the integrity of the multilateral process under the UNFCCC by ensuring the operationalizing of the Cancun Agreements as well as a commitment to deal with unfinished business from the Bali Roadmap and Action Plan. Our wish is for COP17/CMP7 to become an inclusive and transparent platform for the world to take a significant step towards a future climate change regime. All the Parties need to work together to demonstrate that we are taking seriously our responsibility to do what we can to address this global threat”.

Simon being interviewed for the official UNFCC TV.
In Cancun some of the essential elements of the Copenhagen Accord were informally incorporated in to the UNFCCC. These Cancun Agreements addressed issues involving mitigation targets which were pledged by all major national economies, including China and India. The Cancun agreements also included provisions to strengthen finance and transparency. Few are optimistic that Durban will achieve a binding outcome, despite the advances that did occur in Cancun where some of the largest emitting nations within the Developing World agreed to “enter the fold” – in particular China and India - by confirming that they intended to reach certain targets, but not in accordance with legally binding commitments under, say, a Kyoto Protocol with an expanded scope beyond Annex One nations.
Commentators here in Durban are repeatedly stating that Durban really represents a last chance for agreeing on global action before it is too late. The in-coming President of COP17/CMP7, the South African Minister for International Relations and Co-operation, Ms Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, said in her welcoming remarks: “Durban is the end of the line for the postponement of key political issues and we seek to facilitate a balanced and credible outcome that is equitable, fair and inclusive. The Party-Driven-Principle has been emphasised on numerous occasions and we cannot be expected to drive the process as incoming COP President, and prescribe the outcome of the negotiations. We need the support of all countries and parties. We will maintain the integrity of the multilateral process under the UNFCCC by ensuring the operationalizing of the Cancun Agreements as well as a commitment to deal with unfinished business from the Bali Roadmap and Action Plan. Our wish is for COP17/CMP7 to become an inclusive and transparent platform for the world to take a significant step towards a future climate change regime. All the Parties need to work together to demonstrate that we are taking seriously our responsibility to do what we can to address this global threat”.


