A study from Bangladesh found that community
based detoxification programs were a useful initiative
as an advocacy strategy for the harm reduction program
in communities where harm reduction was not widely accepted
nor understood. Dave Burrows shared his study of the
spread of HIV/AIDS in the Russian Federation and his
analysis of the response. Harm reduction initiatives
were undertake by international NGOs and his analysis
of results of this work suggest that it takes seven
years of sustained harm reduction to develop and adequate
response to the epidemic in a country with widespread
injecting drug users and to prevent the epidemic Russia
would have had to start harm reduction before the virus
was discovered. Robert Broadhead pointed out that although
the effectiveness of needle exchange programs was well
documented, the programs were still unpopular within
communities. The study was on the impact of the closure
of a state-sponsored needle exchange on clients and
the community at large. Community debate and adverse
media publicity created controversy that forced the
closure. The study found that the community problems
that were blamed on the needle exchange remained after
the closure and that injecting drug users, after closure,
went back to partaking high-risk behaviour by obtaining
needles from unreliable sources and by reusing and sharing
needles.